Favorite

Wheels Turning 

Opposition to a proposed bike boulevard on Floyd Avenue appears to have softened. But don’t call it a bike boulevard.

click to enlarge This map details the intersections impacted by the proposed changes to Floyd Avenue in the Fan and Museum District.

City of Richmond

This map details the intersections impacted by the proposed changes to Floyd Avenue in the Fan and Museum District.

Following a series of public meetings with a handful of residents who voiced strident opposition, the city seems to be back on track with a plan to give bicycles and pedestrians priority on Floyd Avenue between Monroe Park and North Thompson Street.

The plan, which is expected to cost about $500,000, is fully funded in the city budget, augmented by a $400,000 state grant.

Not a “bike boulevard”

The name, which is used across the country to describe streets that discourage car traffic and encourage biking and walking, was confusing enough to some Richmond residents that city planners have abandoned the term in favor of “RVA bike-walk street.”

The comments that residents submitted about the proposal at the last meeting offered some insight into the misunderstanding that’s surrounded the issue.

“Who will patrol the late-night skateboarders and bikers who will party on the bike lane?” one wondered. Another resident worried about bicycle noise. (Bikes make considerably less noise than cars.)

Plan detailed

As explained Tuesday night, planners intend to replace all four-way stop signs and a handful of traffic signals with traffic circles, which slow car traffic but allow bicycles to continue unimpeded.

A community survey found that 82 percent of residents supported the traffic circles. Only 62 percent supported the installation of diverters, which often are used in bicycle boulevards. Diverters direct car traffic onto side streets but allow cyclists to pass.

Not enough?

Some cyclists worried that the plan, lacking diverters, didn’t go far enough to discourage car traffic. One resident who supported diverters shouted that the proposal was “bullshit.” At a previous meeting, it was the opponents who were shouting their concerns. This time around, the mood was considerably calmer.

Councilmembers Supportive

After the meeting, the three City Council members whose districts that the affected portion of Floyd cuts through said they were generally supportive of the idea. First District Councilman Jon Baliles said he "thinks it's a good start." Fifth District Councilman Parker Agelasto addressed residents who wished the plan went further.

“Here’s the thing,” Agelasto said. “I think a lot of folks are saying, well, we should just become Portland, Oregon, immediately. Well, Richmond is Richmond and we can’t do that. It’s going to take time to plan for all of our residents needs. But you’ve got to start somewhere.”

Second District Councilman Charles Samuels, the most reluctant of the three representatives, remained noncommittal, but suggested he’s open. “It’s not a done deal,” he said, “but a lot of people’s concerns were addressed tonight, and it seemed to enjoy more support.”

Favorite

Comments (22)

Showing 1-22 of 22

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-22 of 22

Add a comment

  • Re: Update to Richmond's Master Plan Underway for the City's 300th Anniversary

    • I was explaining to an Indiana businessman the unique and peculiar Virginia law in which…

    • on July 26, 2017
  • Re: Update to Richmond's Master Plan Underway for the City's 300th Anniversary

    • Maybe Mayor Stoney should address the problems that come with the Dillon rule and the…

    • on July 25, 2017
  • Re: Update to Richmond's Master Plan Underway for the City's 300th Anniversary

    • What needs to be done is in plain sight, but effectively ignored. Stop corporate welfare,…

    • on July 24, 2017
  • More »
  • More by Ned Oliver

    Copyright © 2017 Style Weekly
    Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
    All rights reserved
    Powered by Foundation