Favorite

Stadium Amendments on the Docket Tonight 

click to enlarge Opponents and proponents of the Shockoe Bottom stadium proposal packed City Council's chambers Monday night.

Ned Oliver

Opponents and proponents of the Shockoe Bottom stadium proposal packed City Council's chambers Monday night.

Here are the amendments City Council members have proposed and will consider before they vote tonight on a resolution that advances the mayor’s ballpark proposal:

  • Councilman Jon Baliles proposed striking language that commits the city to cover bonds issued for the project by the Richmond Economic Development Authority. In the event that the project fails to meet financial projections, the amendment would prevent city tax payers from being forced to pick up the tab. Outcome: Approved Unanimously.

  • Baliles and Samuels both introduced amendments that add financial guarantees to the development, requiring developers to put of performance guarantees and personal bonds. Outcome: Approved Unanimously (Baliles' version).

  • Samuels proposed amendments that call for an archeological excavation at the project sites before construction is allowed to begin. The amendment calls for the Historic Richmond Foundation to select the archeological firm and requires developers to pay the cost of the work. Outcome: Voted down 4-5, with Agelasto, Hilbert, Trammell, Samuels in favor and Baliles, Graziano, Mosby, Newbille, Robertson against.

  • On the related Boulevard development, Samuels proposed an amendment that requires “significant citizen input” on any new development. The amendment would require the Boulevard development proposal process be completed before City Council issues permits for the Shockoe Bottom development. Outcome: Voted down 4-5, with Agelasto, Hilbert, Trammell, Samuels in favor and Baliles, Graziano, Mosby, Newbille, Robertson against.

  • Samuels also proposed an amendment that requires a full traffic study on the “anticipated effects of the Shockoe development … that will be presented for review by the council.” Outcome: Voted down 4-5, with Agelasto, Hilbert, Trammell, Samuels in favor and Baliles, Graziano, Mosby, Newbille, Robertson against.

  • Councilwoman Cynthia Newbille proposed an amendment that would require firm financial commitments for the slave heritage site before council offers final approval for other elements of the plan. Outcome: Approved unanimously.

David Hicks, the mayor's senior policy advisor, said the administration won't oppose any of the amendments, though he questioned whether they were all practical.

"It sounds as though council is trying to find a comfort level to move forward," he said. "And that's something we're obviously interested in doing - anything that's a path forward."

Favorite

Latest in News and Features

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

More by Ned Oliver

Connect with Style Weekly

Most Popular Stories

  • Off the Beaten Path

    Off the Beaten Path

    A runner and lifelong lover of the James River captures evocative images of the park system in photo book.
    • Jul 27, 2021
  • Museum Makeovers

    Museum Makeovers

    How four Richmond museums are being transformed.
    • Jul 20, 2021
  • Community Disrupted

    Community Disrupted

    Catching up with former residents of Camp Cathy and the mother figure still helping them survive.
    • Jul 6, 2021
  • Deep Dive

    Deep Dive

    A writer attempts to find the best dive bars in town.
    • Jul 13, 2021
  • More »

Copyright © 2021 Style Weekly
Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
All rights reserved
Powered by Foundation