Port Takeover 

Contributing Editor Peter Galuszka broke the news last week (and follows up in this week's issue on Page 13) that Virginia officials were proposing to take over the financially troubled Port of Richmond, saying they could give the city-owned port an infusion of state money and generate local jobs. Online, some readers responded:

As far as I understand, the historical reason the city held onto the port was because if they didn't, the state would have neglected it and not pushed for the funds to keep the river dredged. If this happens, let's hope it doesn't mean less traffic at the port. — Port of Richmond fan, April 23, 9:15 p.m.

Sounds like something the big boys should really look into. They will probably want to spend a few hundred thousand dollars on a two-year study first though.
— Glen Allen, April 22, 9:57 p.m.



Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Connect with Style Weekly

Newsletter Sign-Up

The Flash
The Bite
The Scoop

Most Popular Stories

  • OPINION: Failing the Test

    OPINION: Failing the Test

    If educators object to standardized testing, the answer is not to cheat but to find ways to teach the next generation about honesty.
    • Jul 10, 2018
  • OPINION: Et tu, Mayor Stoney?

    OPINION: Et tu, Mayor Stoney?

    Despite promises to be different, Mayor Stoney wants to reward Stone Brewing with a $20 million sweetheart deal that includes demolishing an historical structure.
    • Jul 3, 2018
  • Zero Tolerance, Zero Sense

    Zero Tolerance, Zero Sense

    Noncitizens have the same constitutional rights as anyone else to not have their children ripped away.
    • Jun 26, 2018
  • More »

Copyright © 2018 Style Weekly
Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
All rights reserved
Powered by Foundation