Favorite

Polling the Poll 

Scott Keeter, director of survey research for the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press in Washington D.C.:

"Like most surveys, there are aspects one could criticize. The most notable is that the basic question about support begins with a statement that the city has already made a commitment to it, which might lead some otherwise undecided or skeptical people to believe that the proposal has merit. One could also quibble that the question does not explicitly offer the 'no' option — even something as simple as '… or not.'

"But the very high percentage of support, along with the plurality of people who say that the city's commitment is about right, leads me to think that an alternative approach would probably still find majority support for the idea. The relatively large number of people who say they are likely to use it lends credence to that notion.

"I doubt that you could get support much higher with other arguments — given how high it already is. … It might also be the case that the center would fare less well than other potential uses for the city's resources if people had a chance to think about the comparisons. All of this is just speculation, though."



Steven Kull, director of the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland:

"Those two little words at all at the end of the first question would not throw it off significantly. Basically, it looks fine. The conclusions drawn from it are reasonable. The question that comes to mind is: Did they weight the survey properly? It looks skewed high on education … 51 percent report having a college education. That's a question on my mind. But I don't want to overemphasize it. If they did weight it, or not, it would [likely only amount] to a few percentage points.

"If you were trying to predict a tight election, then these little subtleties in the wording might be enough to sway the decision. From what I can see here, it's a suitable interpretation of these results of these findings." — Scott Bass



Letters to the editor may be sent to: letters@styleweekly.com


Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

  • Re: Update to Richmond's Master Plan Underway for the City's 300th Anniversary

    • I was explaining to an Indiana businessman the unique and peculiar Virginia law in which…

    • on July 26, 2017
  • Re: Update to Richmond's Master Plan Underway for the City's 300th Anniversary

    • Maybe Mayor Stoney should address the problems that come with the Dillon rule and the…

    • on July 25, 2017
  • Re: Update to Richmond's Master Plan Underway for the City's 300th Anniversary

    • What needs to be done is in plain sight, but effectively ignored. Stop corporate welfare,…

    • on July 24, 2017
  • More »
  • Latest in Street Talk (Old)

    Copyright © 2017 Style Weekly
    Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
    All rights reserved
    Powered by Foundation