Member since Apr 14, 2011



  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Does Downtown Richmond Have a Parking Problem?

I'm a bit surprised to not hear much about the Pulse and improved bus routes, as well as a bike share system on its way and a still-expanding number of bike lanes in this piece. Those are very important parts of Richmond's parking and transportation system as well. The successes in Washington D.C. described here are a result not just of eliminating parking minimums and the existence of Zipcar, but also a good bike share system and network of bike lanes, along with the Metro.

15 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by jake67 on 08/08/2017 at 4:43 PM

Re: “Jackson Ward Residents Debate Bike Lane Proposal

A couple of issues in the article and comments:
1. People ride bicycles in the city not only for recreation, although it can include that. Many, including people who live in Jackson Ward, use them to get to work and go out to eat, etc. This is not about going on joy rides through the city. It's about expanding our transportation options and making it safer and more inviting for people to ride a bicycle. The more people do that, the less car traffic and pollution there will be, and the fewer parking spaces we will need.
2. SOME cyclists do not obey traffic rules. So do SOME people in cars. We do not tell people who drive cars that they have to be angelic followers of the law before they earn the right to be safe or have a street repaved.

25 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by jake67 on 03/22/2017 at 8:10 AM

Re: “Architecture Review: The Virginia Capital Trail Offers a Sublime Public Amenity

I've ridden the trail twice and am struck by how popular it is and at the range of users -- among those on bicycles all the way from 4 year-old kids and the elderly to folks in lycra on expensive bikes. To me this is a really clear sign for what COULD happen within Richmond itself: if you build bike infrastructure that people feel comfortable and safe riding on, they will use it.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by jake67 on 12/01/2015 at 1:08 PM

Re: “The Mayor's Big Play

I've never heard a compelling argument for why there could not be a new stadium AND other new development on the Boulevard, as the private investor proposal envisioned. The only argument I recall is that there would not be enough space for a ballpark, massive parking lot, and the rest of the development. The notion that you might use any significant portion of valuable land like this for a surface parking lot is insane in any case. Why would a parking deck that could serve both a ballpark and retail -- as was proposed for Shockoe -- not work? Parking decks are expensive, yes, but if this land is so valuable as a source of tax revenue, there must be some way to do it, especially if the Squirrels did a bit of creative planning to encourage the use of other means of transportation to get to their games.

10 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by jake67 on 07/20/2015 at 1:32 PM

Re: “Fan Group Focuses on GRTC Site Options

I hope Mr. Agelasto and others involved will not succumb to the parking-mania that seems to grip so many in the city. Yes, some people will drive cars and need places to park, but we need to get our minds around the fact that a car-dominated Richmond is not sustainable. The population of the city is growing, but where will we end up if we plan new developments with the assumption that all of those new millennial residents will be driving cars? We'll find ourselves in gridlock and wondering why we didn't put more resources into other modes of transportation rather than worrying about parking spaces all the time.

32 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by jake67 on 07/14/2015 at 9:43 PM

Re: “Temple of Love

This is wonderful! Congrats to Heidi.

Sure, there are some good things ensured by zoning ordinances in some cases, but in Richmond they are outdated and overly burdensome, especially for people trying to do creative things.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by jake67 on 05/05/2015 at 6:21 AM

Re: “Flash Forward

Not everything that Mayor Jones has spent money on has been worth it (Redskins training camp is a prime example), but this is. We need affordable and safe transportation options in this city, and this — along with bicycle infrastructure — is a step in that direction. Think about it: the last time the city's population was as high as it's going to be soon, not nearly as many people owned as many cars. It's not going to work to pretend that we're going to be thriving city where everyone still drives everywhere. At some point the parking lots that still take up huge sections of downtown are going to be too valuable to use for that purpose.

Richmonders seem perennially unable to look a bit into the future or see the big picture. Losing some parking spaces but having a better transit system (of which BRT is a part) will only help the businesses along Broad.

19 likes, 13 dislikes
Posted by jake67 on 04/21/2015 at 11:46 PM

All Comments »

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Copyright © 2018 Style Weekly
Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
All rights reserved
Powered by Foundation