Dissecting Genius 

I can tell from his letter (“A Question of Genius,” Dec. 9), that Mr. Ronald E. Renmark is far more intelligent and sophisticated in the arena of art than I will ever be. Yet, his letter confused me. He asserts that an earlier Style Weekly critique by Mike Dulin of somebody called Richard Nickel (“Children of Men,” Arts & Culture, Nov. 25) mistakenly called the artwork of Nickel “sculpture” when it was not — it was only a photograph. Mr. Renmark goes on, confusingly, talking about and trashing the great sculptors of all time. What gives? Is Nickel a photographer or a sculptor?

Mr. Renmark dismisses the “superficial elements” found in the works of Michelangelo, Lorenzo Ghiberti and others. He says that when he looks at the masterpieces, he feels nothing. On the other hand, a popsicle-stick sends goose bumps up his spine. Without knowing, I would guess the Mr. Renmark has no idea who Count Basie was and went into mourning when Michael Jackson killed himself. Perhaps he would enjoy an art appreciation course at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, Virginia Commonwealth University or Maggie Walker High School.

David H. Worrell Jr.



Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Connect with Style Weekly

Most Popular Stories

  • Week of June 23

    Week of June 23

    • Jun 23, 2021
  • A Salute to Mr. Williams

    A Salute to Mr. Williams

    The Pulitzer Prize won by Michael Paul Williams is due recognition that Richmond is changing – thanks in part to brave people like him.
    • Jun 18, 2021
  • OPINION: School Board Drama

    OPINION: School Board Drama

    Updated: click link to see the real costs of building two elementary schools and a middle school in Richmond.
    • Jun 15, 2021
  • Week of June 16

    Week of June 16

    • Jun 16, 2021
  • More »

Copyright © 2021 Style Weekly
Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
All rights reserved
Powered by Foundation