Ballpark or No Ballpark, Shockoe Bottom Still May Get a Hotel 

click to enlarge David S. White and H. Louis Salomonsky, co-owners of Historic Housing LLC, purchased the old Weiman's bakery building in April last year. If the ballpark development falls through, the pair says they plan to develop it as an extended stay hotel.

Scott Elmquist

David S. White and H. Louis Salomonsky, co-owners of Historic Housing LLC, purchased the old Weiman's bakery building in April last year. If the ballpark development falls through, the pair says they plan to develop it as an extended stay hotel.

Desolate. Dark. Vacant.

City officials, developers and assorted ballpark boosters have been painting a gloomy picture of Shockoe Bottom’s future should the mayor’s stadium proposal fail.

“If there’s no baseball stadium, there will be no other development,” the city’s chief administrative officer, Byron Marshall, told City Council’s Finance Committee last week. “There won’t be apartments. There won’t be a grocery store. There won’t be a hotel.”

But is it true?

A key developer acknowledged Friday that it plans to build on land it owns in the proposed stadium’s footprint if the ballpark’s deal goes south.

“There’s no way in the world we’re going to sit there with a vacant piece of land for the rest of our lives with our finger in our ear,” H. Louis Salomonsky says.

He and David S. White co-own Historic Housing, a development company that owns properties in the Bottom with an assessed value totaling $83 million. Those properties include the old Weiman’s Bakery, which the company purchased in April 2013 and which is located at home plate of the proposed stadium.

The company would consider building an extended-stay hotel on the property, Salomonsky says, which could be eligible for historic tax credits and the city’s tax abatement program.

In addition, the city’s financial analysis of Richmond’s ballpark options suggests that if the stadium stays on the Boulevard, a Shockoe redevelopment still would contain apartments, a grocery store and a parking deck, although there would be 672 fewer living units and far less parking.

The lower numbers are related to uncertainty about what would happen to the two blocks between 17th Street and the CSX railroad tracks. The majority of that land is owned by the Loving family and lies in a flood plain that for years has been a barrier to development.

At the city Finance Committee meeting Thursday, 5th District Councilman Parker Agelasto pressed officials and White on the issue: What if the city simply committed to mitigating the flood plain and allowed development to continue naturally?

After all, Agelasto said, under the current deal the city is committing $23.4 million to infrastructure upgrades. The expense is necessary for construction of the ball field, and isn’t figured into the city’s financial analysis that says baseball will pay for itself.

Marshall stressed that the cost of mitigating the flood plain depended on what development was planned. Work would need to be tied to specific construction scenarios, he said.

On the development end, White said unequivocally that he wouldn’t build apartments in the flood zone without a stadium, citing high construction costs even with planned flood mitigation.

With a stadium, White said, he can afford the more expensive building techniques necessary in the area, because apartments next to a ballpark would fetch a higher rent.

Is a stadium the only anchor that would draw tenants to higher-priced units? “Yeah, we could wonder,” White says in an interview the next day with Style Weekly. “But there comes a time when you just have to grab the opportunity.”


Comments (10)

Showing 1-10 of 10

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-10 of 10

Add a comment

  • Re: Richmond Seeks to Open Up Its Process for Selling Property

    • Does anyone really think the incompetents who populate City Hall can streamline and simplify a…

    • on July 21, 2017
  • Re: Move Over Cat Cafe: Get Ready For Lizards and Lattes in Richmond

    • Good Lord. Shut The Fuck Up.

    • on July 21, 2017
  • Re: Richmond Schools and State Board of Education Move Closer to a "Corrective Action Plan"

    • On the topic of Ms. Eppes: http://www.richmond.com/news/local/city-of-richmond/school-board-member-convicted-of-passing-stopped-school-bus-plans/article_4fff29df-e468-5eb9-9b74-130e41af1255.html http://wtvr.com/2014/10/07/richmond-school-board-confirms-member-leaked-student-files/ Slowful? I don't think that is a…

    • on July 21, 2017
  • More »
  • Latest in News and Features

    More by Ned Oliver

    • Auto Spying

      Auto Spying

      Virginia lawmakers are fighting against the use of license-plate scanners by police. But what about the people privately watching your whereabouts?
      • Apr 28, 2015
    • City Explores Tax on Richmond Airbnb Rentals

      City Explores Tax on Richmond Airbnb Rentals

      • Apr 21, 2015
    • Flash Forward

      Flash Forward

      Richmond is getting a $54 million, high-speed bus line right down Broad Street. But do we need it? Here are the answers to seven questions you might be asking.
      • Apr 21, 2015
    • More »

    Copyright © 2017 Style Weekly
    Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
    All rights reserved
    Powered by Foundation