Member since May 30, 2013



  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Richmond Chilly to Naked Readers

Feeling a little pre-menstrual today, aren't we Ben? Maybe you're worried your place in the patriarchy is just a tad shaky?

0 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Ariadne on 06/07/2013 at 7:34 AM

Re: “Richmond Chilly to Naked Readers

Gee Ben, I thought you'd never ask...who could resist such an onslaught of patriarchal non-charm hurtling her way?

2 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Ariadne on 06/06/2013 at 7:28 AM

Re: “Richmond Chilly to Naked Readers

Sorry, Ned--I find the whole concept simply stupid. Not 'cool', not 'edgy', not 'trendy... and about as far a cry from either 'smart' or 'sexy' as anything I'd care to imagine. And I make no apologies for my opinion on that. And if we're starting 'wrist smackies' in regard to the alleged 'insults', Ned--I merely remarked on what the two women depicted in the photo appeared to be to me--they appeared to be in the category of what most physicians refer to as 'well-nourished', and I hope you're not debating that they both appear to be on the pnky-beige end of the pigmentation spectrum. And their costumes--such as they were--certainly appear to be what the current trend refers to as 'emo'. Perhaps, Ned, you might want to get your dander up a bit more with the Benster, who came huffing onto the scene as though he believed shannpalmer and I were seriously attempting to abort his sacred First-and-a-Half Amendment rights to burn the images of as many nekkid women onto his retinas as he sees fit, and then started tossing about mature, and thoughtful terms such as "joyless shitbirds" to castigate those who don't share his views 110%. Oh, but I forgot--it's only those who voice even mild scepticism/criticism over these kinds of shenanigans who are the joyless neurotics who warrant public castigation for their opinions. Folks like Ben are healthy, well-rounded 'progressives' whose insults are profound insights into the character of those whom he imagines are threatening his rights to have women be reduced to eye-candy for his amusement.

2 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Ariadne on 06/04/2013 at 7:05 AM

Re: “Richmond Chilly to Naked Readers

Ben, you genuinely are an almighty bore on this topic. Maybe you just don't have enough nudity goin' on in your life, pasty or otherwise.

2 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Ariadne on 06/03/2013 at 6:51 PM

Re: “Richmond Chilly to Naked Readers

Ben, if you're over the age of twelve you ought to know enough to be aware that prefacing a comment with a remark such as "Well, I personally don't do (insert subject in question here)" constitutes pretty much of an open invitation to onlookers that you actually DO engage in the activity thusly denied.

If you don't know this, then I'm not sure whether you're a "joyless" shitbird or no, but you're certainly a rather naif one.

2 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by Ariadne on 06/03/2013 at 7:31 AM

Re: “Richmond Chilly to Naked Readers

'Not that I'm the type of guy who'd personally pay to watch women get naked'

Of course you aren't , Ben.

2 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Ariadne on 05/31/2013 at 6:31 PM

Re: “Richmond Chilly to Naked Readers

"This is a lighthearted event that gives Richmond a chance to feel smart and sexy"

Yes, because watching a couple of wanna-be strippers using a nonsensical pretext to get naked in front of the sad and geeky (thanks, shannpalmer!) is just the chance to feel 'smart and sexy' that would of course otherwise be missing from the lives of hundreds of Richmonders. Please.

10 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Ariadne on 05/31/2013 at 7:12 AM

All Comments »

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Copyright © 2018 Style Weekly
Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
All rights reserved
Powered by Foundation