Abortion Clinics Await Key Vote 

The State Board of Health considers regulations that could force many abortion clinics to close.

click to enlarge Pro-choice activists sat in silent protest during a Virginia Board of Health meeting Sept. 14, when the board upheld key provisions of the new abortion clinic regulations. - SCOTT ELMQUIST
  • Scott Elmquist
  • Pro-choice activists sat in silent protest during a Virginia Board of Health meeting Sept. 14, when the board upheld key provisions of the new abortion clinic regulations.

Women's rights activists are mobilizing in Richmond this week while the Virginia Board of Health prepares to finalize new regulations that are expected to close many of state's 20 abortion clinics.

A coalition of women's health advocates plan to descend on the Board of Health's meeting Friday, where members are widely expected to approve targeted regulations of abortion providers.

The new rules would go into effect during the next year, requiring existing clinics to conform to architectural guidelines that proponents say will ensure patient safety.

Detractors say the guidelines are unnecessarily burdensome — in some cases, retrofitting the clinics can be cost-prohibitive — and unfairly target women's clinics in a politically motivated effort to shut them down and limit access to abortion in Virginia.

Among those planning to testify at the meeting are Dr. Karen Remley, the former state health commissioner who resigned last year, citing political interference and overreach by Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli's office.

"It's not a pro-choice or a pro-life issue," she says. "It is a good government issue. The regulations are illegal."

Remley says she'll urge the board to be objective. "We should have a thoughtful approach. Not a punitive approach. It should be similar to how we regulate all our other health care facilitates."

Molly Vick, an organizer of last year's women's rights protests, says she's petitioning the Board of Health to also retroactively apply guidelines to other existing health facilities, such as hospitals and nursing homes. She says Cuccinelli's interpretation of the relevant laws and regulations support her petition, which she says she's filing to show that the attorney general and the board aren't motivated by general health safety concerns but by a desire to shutter abortion clinics.

Katherine Greenier, the director of the Women's Rights Project at the Virginia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, calls Cuccinelli's position baffling.

In an email, she writes: "It is clear that the Attorney General's office is offering a new interpretation of Virginia law in order to force physician's offices and clinics that provide abortion services to meet standards that have never been imposed on any other type of health care facility."



Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

  • Re: Capping Carbon: What Does Dominion Think?

    • Anyone want to guess who "Citizen" is?

    • on May 26, 2017
  • Re: 13 Takeaways from the City’s Performance Review

    • For the most part, the problems at City Hall are not the people working there…

    • on May 26, 2017
  • Re: Capping Carbon: What Does Dominion Think?

    • Thanks to ZEUSHACKERS01 At OUTLOOK dot COM . My lawyer and I knew nothing about…

    • on May 25, 2017
  • More »
  • Latest in News and Features

    More by Ned Oliver

    • Auto Spying

      Virginia lawmakers are fighting against the use of license-plate scanners by police. But what about the people privately watching your whereabouts?
      • Apr 28, 2015
    • City Explores Tax on Richmond Airbnb Rentals

      • Apr 21, 2015
    • Flash Forward

      Richmond is getting a $54 million, high-speed bus line right down Broad Street. But do we need it? Here are the answers to seven questions you might be asking.
      • Apr 21, 2015
    • More »

    Copyright © 2017 Style Weekly
    Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
    All rights reserved
    Powered by Foundation