Keep Your Eye On the Ballpark

The present ballpark proposal depends on public subsidy by diverting local taxes to pay off its debts ("Building a Village," News & Features, Feb. 16). Taxes are public money. And those taxes forgone by the city would have to be made up by all other existing businesses, residents and visitors.

How much longer will City Council allow itself to be bullied into subsidizing new grandiose developments, bringing extra costs and unfair competition down upon existing business firms, restaurants and shops — and driving the marginal out of town or to close?

Tony Pelling

Letters to the editor may be sent to: letters@styleweekly.com



Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Connect with Style Weekly

Newsletter Sign-Up

The Flash
The Bite
The Scoop

Most Popular Stories

  • OPINION: Failing the Test

    OPINION: Failing the Test

    If educators object to standardized testing, the answer is not to cheat but to find ways to teach the next generation about honesty.
    • Jul 10, 2018
  • OPINION: Et tu, Mayor Stoney?

    OPINION: Et tu, Mayor Stoney?

    Despite promises to be different, Mayor Stoney wants to reward Stone Brewing with a $20 million sweetheart deal that includes demolishing an historical structure.
    • Jul 3, 2018
  • Zero Tolerance, Zero Sense

    Zero Tolerance, Zero Sense

    Noncitizens have the same constitutional rights as anyone else to not have their children ripped away.
    • Jun 26, 2018
  • More »

Copyright © 2018 Style Weekly
Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
All rights reserved
Powered by Foundation