Sculptor Sanguine After Ashe Statue Deemed Inadvertently Horrifying 

click to enlarge Sculptor Paul DiPasquale at the dedication of the Arthur Ashe momument in 1996.

File photo by Stephen Salpukas

Sculptor Paul DiPasquale at the dedication of the Arthur Ashe momument in 1996.

Richmond sculptor Paul DiPasquale is not impressed by your hastily-thrown together list, Mental Floss.

The national magazine included DiPasquale’s statue of tennis great and city native Arthur Ashe in an article titled “10 Unintentionally Horrifying Statues of Famous People.”

DiPasquale’s Ashe was number three for showing him “holding books and a tennis racket high above the outstretched arms of a gaggle of children, frozen forever in a state of seemingly mocking them for their lack of height.”

The statue went up back in 1996, and, at this point, dedicating any amount of time or effort to criticizing it comes across as passé.

First there were the Confederates, who protested Ashe’s inclusion on a roadway largely dedicated to their Civil War heroes. Then there were the amateur art critics. Lots of them. (By the way, Mental Floss, no one here thinks Ashe is taunting the kids; he’s obviously beating them.)

Nonetheless, DiPasquale was kind enough to play along when Style asked him if he had a clever retort to the latest criticism.

"If you always see what you always saw, you will always get what you always got," he writes.

Asked to elaborate, he replied: “That was cryptic? Well, judging art, like life, depends on what you bring to it, I'm sure.”

That’s right, Mental Floss. The statue’s not inadvertently horrifying; you’re inadvertently horrifying.

Comments (19)

Showing 1-19 of 19

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-19 of 19

Add a comment

  • Re: VOTE TODAY: 2017 Best of Richmond

    • No Best Photographer??

    • on February 23, 2017
  • Re: Q&A: Is Richmond a Sanctuary City? Yes and No.

    • This article is incoherent. In one paragraph, we're told about a family that came here…

    • on February 23, 2017
  • Re: Q&A: Is Richmond a Sanctuary City? Yes and No.

    • I don't believe the Trumpkins even read the article. They see the word "immigrant" and…

    • on February 23, 2017
  • More »
  • More by Ned Oliver

    • Auto Spying

      Virginia lawmakers are fighting against the use of license-plate scanners by police. But what about the people privately watching your whereabouts?
      • Apr 28, 2015
    • City Explores Tax on Richmond Airbnb Rentals

      • Apr 21, 2015
    • Flash Forward

      Richmond is getting a $54 million, high-speed bus line right down Broad Street. But do we need it? Here are the answers to seven questions you might be asking.
      • Apr 21, 2015
    • More »

    Copyright © 2017 Style Weekly
    Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
    All rights reserved
    Powered by Foundation