Public Doesn't Need to Know Everything 

Can someone at Style Weekly please explain to me why in the world you awarded -3 points to the city zeigeist on the news that public access to personal information was closed down ("The Score," Street Talk, April 11)?

I refer to the database of people with permits to carry concealed weapons, which for a time was opened but then removed from public view. Are you arguing for the release of any information the government may have about any individual?

I fail to see how this information is anyone else's business. And so it follows that I fail to understand how this action by the attorney general can be regarded as anything but a positive one by those who respect the privacy of others.

Keith Vollero
Richmond



  • Click here for more Forum

    Comments

    Subscribe to this thread:

    Add a comment

  • Re: Opinion: Sorry "Pet Parents," But Your Animals Are Not Your Children

    • Now if only real parents could get their children to behave as well as my…

    • on September 27, 2016
  • Re: Opinion: Sorry "Pet Parents," But Your Animals Are Not Your Children

    • GSD and the rest of Jeff's supporters, think what you may but you have no…

    • on September 26, 2016
  • Re: Opinion: Sorry "Pet Parents," But Your Animals Are Not Your Children

    • JEFF IS RIGHT! I am a parent of humans and a pet owner and they…

    • on September 25, 2016
  • More »
  • Copyright © 2016 Style Weekly
    Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
    All rights reserved
    Powered by Foundation