Dominion Resources' selfish plan offers its employees a riverfront view but does little for downtown's economy. 

False Stimulus

The headline of a full-page Dominion Resources ad recently called the company's plans "a $95 million a year stimulus package for the Richmond economy."

During a Nov. 1 meeting of the city planning commission, Gregory Wingfield, president of the Greater Richmond Partnership said, "If you turn down this rezoning request, you have effectively said the city of Richmond is closed for business."

"The City of Richmond is open for business after all," crowed the Richmond Times-Dispatch in an editorial printed soon after the commission endorsed a special-use permit for Dominion's corporate expansion plans on Tredegar Street.

They're all wrong.

A real stimulus package to bolster business downtown would use urban design and architectural principles that would tighten, intensify and serve to repopulate the central downtown district, not pull in a westward direction beyond the Lee Bridge.

Stimulus would mean building the corporate headquarters on one of the disfiguring chunks of open real estate that create major disconnects throughout downtown. These asphalt parking lots keep Richmond from having the physical and visual continuity of other evocative East Coast cities such as Charleston and Savannah.

A real stimulus package would mean harnessing the considerable vitality — and buying power — of more than 1,000 Dominion employees, weaving them into the daily rubric of what constitutes downtown: shops, services, tourists, convention-goers, restaurants, public transit, cultural attractions and racial and social diversity.

But Dominion doesn't give a hoot about "a stimulus" for the downtown economy. It really doesn't want to be a part of things. It wants its river view. It wants a gated office park.

If Dominion wants to be hailed as hero — savior, even — of downtown, why did it desert downtown in the first place and move its headquarters to suburban Innsbrook? We should trust its wisdom now?

The utility company, the chamber of commerce and the Times-Dispatch editorial page have tried to paint the citizens and community and environmental groups who argue against putting so intense a development in the flood plain — and in a historically and environmentally fragile site — as obstructionists. Truth to tell, it's Dominion that's obstructionist. Downtown economic development will be considerably set back by placing this expansion in a location that has few economic spinoff effects.

Although opponents have been painted as being anti-business, they're not. Far from it. Concerned citizens and community groups from across the region are asking for common sense. They're asking that we examine the site from all vantage points — from atop Oregon Hill, Hollywood Cemetery, from Belle Isle, the Lee Bridge and from various points on the south side of the river. They wisely oppose anything that would encroach further on horizon lines and historic views. They recognize that this precious, historic, urban landscape is worth more to the city's development and downtown's long-term appeal than a piece of office-park architecture that would rise above the hillsides or treetops.

Just because buildings currently are on the site is no reason additional construction should go there. The former James River Corp. plant evolved from the 19th century, a time when rivers were chief sources of power. Scores of American cities blighted their riverfronts during the industrial age — Wilmington, Newark and Brooklyn. Others, such as Boston and Philadelphia, defaced their waterways with highways. Somehow, miraculously, Richmond largely escaped such catastrophic development and the James remains a wild river.

So now, in the 21st century, having come this distance, we're going to infringe on this precious resource?

Dominion is not alone in potentially hurting downtown by its current and unfortunate site choice. Other downtown corporate complexes do damage daily by sending similar signals — the twin-towered Riverfront Plaza, the James Center, the SunTrust operations center in Manchester and the Federal Reserve Bank all architecturally project the same psychology: We're sort of part of downtown — as long as our employees can pull off the expressway, drive into a garage, take an elevator to their desks and eat on-site.

Dominion, like these, is signaling that it is reluctant to rub elbows with the larger downtown. What message does this send its employees? It reinforces old prejudices.

"I go downtown to Shockoe Slip for lunch," a Dominion Resources executive who currently works on Tredegar Street said recently. "It's only a six-minute drive."

Bingo. He makes my point.

Imagine 1,000 Dominion employees exiting their parking deck at lunch hour, driving downtown and finding a parking space. I don't think so.

Instead, they will eat in the company cafeteria and enjoy their gated, riverfront vistas. Who needs


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

  • Re: Switch Voter: A Richmond Businessman Leads a Made-For-TV Brigade of Trumpocrats

    • Rickers must have been undermining Democrats since he was many of those Dems got…

    • on October 24, 2016
  • Re: Library of Virginia Layoffs Will Hinder Open Government, Preservation of Historical Record

    • This is what happens when you elect a doofus who's is a politician first, and…

    • on October 23, 2016
  • Re: Switch Voter: A Richmond Businessman Leads a Made-For-TV Brigade of Trumpocrats

    • Donald Trump is a very bad candidate. But all the others are so much worse.

    • on October 23, 2016
  • More »
  • Latest in Miscellany

    More by Edwin Slipek Jr

    • The 2011 Bar Guide

      Whether we were Revolutionary patriots, moonshine runners or just imperfect souls considering our bar tabs, we're all just passing through. So why not stop for a few sips along the way?
      • Jun 14, 2011
    • After the Fire

      The South fell, and Richmond went up in flames. But the Civil War is still here — if you know where to look.
      • May 10, 2011
    • Digging Up Bones

      A monumental new book chronicles 160 years of the real Hollywood.
      • Oct 6, 2010
    • More »

    Copyright © 2016 Style Weekly
    Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
    All rights reserved
    Powered by Foundation