Did the Redskins Pay Off For Richmond? Maybe. 

click to enlarge Fans flocked to the Redskins Training Camp in late July and early August. A city analysis expected to be released next week says the camp boosted hotel, food, gas and other retail sales more than expected.

Scott Elmquist

Fans flocked to the Redskins Training Camp in late July and early August. A city analysis expected to be released next week says the camp boosted hotel, food, gas and other retail sales more than expected.

Hark. It's Christmas Day and the city's chief administrative officer is sending out emails to City Council about the Redskins training camp.

The yuletide greeting promises that a study of the economic impact of the team's camp will be released in the coming week, and joy-be-to-Mayor-Jones, a draft of the report obtained by Style Weekly indicates the findings will suggest the camp beat financial expectations.

Tax revenues collected by retailers, hotels, restaurants and other categories the city says would be impacted by an influx of tourists increased $230,000 in July and August compared to the same months in 2012, according to the report, which concludes the camp increased city revenues by about $50,000 more the $180,000 initially projected by the economic consulting firm hired by the city.

Awesome, right?

Maybe. Leisure economist John Gerner, who reviewed the report, says the study doesn't actually tell us that much and needs to be read with some important caveats.

The first is obvious: The analysis, completed by the city's Finance Department, essentially attributes any additional economic activity over a 60-day period to the 17-day training camp. Gerner says that without direct reports from businesses involved in the camp, this is the best the city can do, but it doesn't tell the whole story. (The city does, however, have access to more detailed tax data than the general public. Overall, Richmond retail sales were down 6.8 percent between August 2012 and 2013, according to the state Department of Taxation.)

"The assumption is that the increase in the financial results was due to the training camp," Gerner says. "This may have been the case, but there were other possible factors in the time periods that could have affected the results. A typical reason is inflation, which alone should have increased tax revenues somewhat. Weather conditions and other local events at that time would also be factors."

Likewise, the report offers no comparison to how other Virginia localities fared during the same months, making it difficult to tell how much of the growth is unique to Richmond and its new camp.

The full report is expected to include more information, including the results of a separate study conducted by Richmond Region Tourism and Virginia Commonwealth University.

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

  • Re: New $11.3 Million Bridge Connects Downtown With Manchester

    • Coming to Richmond this weekend. Hope I get to cross the bridge with my daughter!

    • on December 5, 2016
  • Re: New $11.3 Million Bridge Connects Downtown With Manchester

    • Ms. Sykes' comment is telling; I dont know that itll save me any time, she…

    • on December 5, 2016
  • Re: The Brain-Makers

    • After been diagnose with Parkinson disease seems the end of life for me which i…

    • on December 5, 2016
  • More »
  • More by Ned Oliver

    • Auto Spying

      Virginia lawmakers are fighting against the use of license-plate scanners by police. But what about the people privately watching your whereabouts?
      • Apr 28, 2015
    • City Explores Tax on Richmond Airbnb Rentals

      • Apr 21, 2015
    • Flash Forward

      Richmond is getting a $54 million, high-speed bus line right down Broad Street. But do we need it? Here are the answers to seven questions you might be asking.
      • Apr 21, 2015
    • More »

    Copyright © 2016 Style Weekly
    Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
    All rights reserved
    Powered by Foundation