Councilmen Consider Reducing Tax Abatement 

The bill has been temporarily put on hold while city officials re-evaluate the business incentive program.

Including residential properties, the tax abatement program accounts for $13.3 million in potential tax revenue for the fiscal year ending June 30, city officials project. Total real-estate tax revenues for the same period are projected to be $185.2 million, an increase of $5.1 million from the previous fiscal year.

The council members think the tax program is too generous. Wilder (see story on page 11) says the city is past the point of needing drastic incentives such as 15-year abatements to lure business to the city.

"I don't think we can do away with it, but it's definitely something we need to scale back," Graziano says. "These abatement programs are great, but there's a point when areas take off on their own. And that's when you should back off."

The discussion comes as City Council and Mayor Wilder struggle to find enough revenue to pay for basic city services. Last week, City Council voted to restore $18 million to the mayor's proposed budget, creating a $7 million deficit.

It's unclear how much tax revenue would be generated by scaling back the commercial and industrial portions of the abatement program. The proposed bill wouldn't touch the residential tax abatement program, Graziano says.

John Woodward, economic development director for the city, says his office is poring over the proposal, trying to determine what effect it might have on the incentives provided to property owners located in the city's enterprise zones. The state offers additional business incentives, such as job tax credits, within those zones. But it requires localities to provide certain incentives of its own in order to qualify.

"The tax abatement program is just one cog in the wheel," Woodward says, adding that changing the program could affect the status of its enterprise zones. "As with any economic tool, you don't want to look at anything in a vacuum."

By state law, the city can change the incentives offered within those enterprise zones once a year. Any changes would have to be made sometime after September. — Scott Bass

Letters to the editor may be sent to:


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

  • Re: Capping Carbon: What Does Dominion Think?

    • Hello!! Im indeed very happy for the great help that Dr. okorom rendered to me,…

    • on May 24, 2017
  • Re: Capping Carbon: What Does Dominion Think?

    • Yeah pack, god forbid everyone who studies the subject is wrong and we're left with…

    • on May 23, 2017
  • Re: Capping Carbon: What Does Dominion Think?

    • yes Will, it is much easier to just trust the "environment experts" (even though they…

    • on May 23, 2017
  • More »
  • Latest in Street Talk (Old)

    Copyright © 2017 Style Weekly
    Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
    All rights reserved
    Powered by Foundation