Contractor Sues Virginia Couple for $90K Over Squirrel Attack 

click to enlarge squirrel.jpg

Daniel Felice was doing contract work in the suburbs this summer when – according to a lawsuit – a squirrel attacked him.

It bit and scratched. Left him “profusely bleeding.”

When the animal eventually jumped off, it darted into a house with young children inside. So Felice went in to chase the squirrel out.

Then the animal ran to a neighbor’s property, where, the lawsuit says, a couple was keeping the squirrel as a pet.

Felice has since sued the couple – Deborah and Paul Desjardin – seeking $90,000 in damages for injuries he says were caused by their “pet squirrel.”

But reached by phone recently, Paul Desjardin said they never kept the squirrel as a pet.

Desjardin said the squirrel lived outside in their Great Bridge neighborhood, but it never lived indoors with them. They fed the squirrel a “little bit,” and it became friendly, but Desjardin said they only saw the squirrel every couple of days and it “never was controlled by us.”

“We never had a pet squirrel,” he said.

The lawsuit claims the Desjardins’ dog brought the squirrel to their door this spring, and that Deborah Desjardin adopted the animal, fed it and provided medical care.

The squirrel began to peck her lips as if “giving her a kiss,” and the couple encouraged the animal to approach humans, the suit alleges.

On July 11, the squirrel attacked a child standing outside her home, according to the suit. Deborah Desjardin apologized to the girl’s parents and said she would “wring his neck” for the incident, the suit says.

Paul Desjardin said he was unaware of any conversation his wife may have had with the parents. He was out of town at the time.

The squirrel attacked Felice three days later, according to the suit. It bit and scratched his leg and hand.

Under city code, residents are not allowed to keep wild animals without a permit.

An officer with the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries charged Deborah Desjardin with misdemeanor unlawful possession of wildlife after the reported attack on Felice. Court records show a General District judge dismissed the case this fall.

Paul Desjardin said Felice’s lawsuit makes many assumptions, and that he and his wife already proved their innocence in court when the judge dismissed the charge.

He said their insurance company is handling the suit, which was filed last month in Circuit Court.

Felice’s lawyer could not be reached for comment last week.

“We’ve already proven the fact that this wasn’t our squirrel,” Desjardin said. “It’s not a pet.”

This story originally appeared on

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

  • Re: Bon Air Residents Petition Against Goodwill

    • The virtue of Goodwill is not the issue; the issue is property rights. When you…

    • on April 25, 2017
  • Re: Sweet Buzz: Inside the Team Spirit and Creative Force that Powers the Rise of Sugar Shack Donuts

    • Ian, please don't franchise and sell out. Your name may suffer! No harm intended.

    • on April 25, 2017
  • Re: Proposed Tax Increases Draw Arts Groups, Musicians and Cigarette Vendors

    • Oh, the delicious irony of tax money parasites like Garka, Bender and Fisk whining against…

    • on April 25, 2017
  • More »
  • Latest in News and Features

    Copyright © 2017 Style Weekly
    Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
    All rights reserved
    Powered by Foundation