City Council Calls Out Department for Open Application on Reedy Creek 

click to enlarge The Reedy Creek project was voted down by City Council, but the Department of Public Utilities still holds an open permit application for the project.

Scott Elmquist

The Reedy Creek project was voted down by City Council, but the Department of Public Utilities still holds an open permit application for the project.

A Richmond official agreed to promise in writing that his department would withdraw an application for a controversial Reedy Creek project, following a tense discussion with City Council members Monday.

The agreement came after council’s Organizational Development Standing Committee called on Deputy Chief Administration Officer John Buturla to answer reports that the Department of Public Utilities hadn’t canceled a permit application for the stream restoration plan.

City Council voted in November to reject state funds for the project after heavy opposition from Forest Hill neighbors and other community members.

“It’s become clear that permits are still in process with the Army Corps of Engineers,” Councilman Parker Agelasto said at Monday’s meeting. “Citizens thought they’d be included in the development of alternate plans, but haven’t been contacted.”

Buturla said the department wouldn’t kill the permit, and that the Army Corps of Engineers owed it a response. He suggested that the city could use the permit determination for a different future project. Once given, the permit would be valid for five years.

“None of this should be causing consternation,” Buturla said. “This project is dead. It’s done. It’s not moving forward. We’re beyond it.”

But in response to a query from Councilwoman Kristen Larson, he committed to submitting a statement in writing that the department wouldn’t move forward with the Reedy Creek project that was denied by City Council.

An Army Corps of Engineers representative told Style in December that any other project would have to go through the permitting process again, and that the open application applied only to the project that was rejected by council.

The grant offered by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality came from a federal program to lessen pollution entering the Chesapeake Bay. It’s unclear whether that 2010 program will continue under new leadership at the Environmental Protection Agency.

Comments (8)

Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

  • Re: Volunteers Step Up to Help Track the Promises Made by Richmond’s Elected Officials

    • Thanks for the plug for Open Source RVA. But the show does not air on…

    • on February 22, 2017
  • Re: Q&A: Is Richmond a Sanctuary City? Yes and No.

    • Clown, I believe Trump promised that his appointees would not take lobbying gigs for a…

    • on February 22, 2017
  • Re: Virginia Voter Registration Records Have Loopholes but No Evidence of Widespread Fraud

    • @Sloopy, because it's true.

    • on February 22, 2017
  • More »
  • More by Jackie Kruszewski

    Copyright © 2017 Style Weekly
    Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
    All rights reserved
    Powered by Foundation