Attack of the Cat-Faced Liquor Thieves 

click to enlarge Cat faces conceal the identities of shoplifters caught in the act at the Parham One Shopping Center liquor store. - SCOTT ELMQUIST
  • Scott Elmquist
  • Cat faces conceal the identities of shoplifters caught in the act at the Parham One Shopping Center liquor store.

What do you do if you’re bored, thirsty and broke?

In Richmond, you shoplift E&J Brandy — a decidedly down-market drink.

That’s the brand of liquor shoplifted most frequently from city liquor stores in the last 12 months. In general, light-fingered drinkers prefer vodka, and not the cheap stuff: Absolut and Grey Goose were grabbed most often. The fanciest brands stolen were Patron tequila and Chambord raspberry liqueur.

But Richmonders don’t steal much booze, all things considered — or perhaps they just don’t get caught. From May 2010 to May 2011, the Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control recorded 98 shoplifting busts in the city of Richmond, of merchandise totaling $2,576.60. Nearly half of those thefts were from a single store, at 3100 W. Broad St. Most thefts were single bottles, ABC spokeswoman Kathleen Shaw says.

The ABC prosecutes shoplifters if it can catch them, Shaw says. But employees’ safety comes first, she says: “We don’t ask that they put themselves at risk.”

If you’re a liquor thief, think twice before hitting the ABC store at the Parham One Shopping Center in Henrico County. You might end up with whiskers. Manager Girard Bowe has established a wall of shame of video surveillance photos of convicted shoplifters. He obscures their faces with pictures of his cat — and in one instance, a Santa Claus beard.

The warning works, Bowe writes via email: “The wall of shame has been up about two years, and I believe it’s had a positive effect on our inventory results.”

Whether you’re taking an airplane bottle or a specialty 30-year Canadian Club ($179), as long as it’s worth less than $200 it’s classified as petit larceny, a class-one misdemeanor. A conviction carries a maximum sentence of 12 months and a fine of as much as $2,500.

As Bowe’s wall says, “It would have been cheaper to pay for them.”


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

  • Re: Repeat Exam

    • Does the fact that Binford supposedly has poor test scores mean that its teachers are…

    • on November 20, 2014
  • Re: Repeat Exam

    • Any non-religious options for private middle school? I'd love to know. (fuck all of us,…

    • on November 20, 2014
  • Re: City Council Beefs Up Security

    • oh hell no, we have to read Becky's bs now?!

    • on November 20, 2014
  • More »
  • Facebook Recommendations

    Latest in News and Features

    • Video Fan Meets Fundraising Goal, Will Stay Open

      • Nov 20, 2014
    • End Game

      Ballpark opponents claim victory in the Shockoe stadium debate. Has the plan gone out with a whimper or is it lying in wait?
      • Nov 18, 2014
    • Repeat Exam

      As the Richmond School Board begins to grapple with rezoning, longtime debates are flaring up.
      • Nov 18, 2014
    • More »

    More by Melissa Scott Sinclair

    • The Martin Man

      Purple-martin landlord prepares to say goodbye to his birds.
      • Jul 29, 2014
    • La Pulga

      The changing face of Richmond's largest flea market.
      • Jul 8, 2014
    • Anything Goes

      Connector, collaborator, curator: Inside the mind of artist Heide Trepanier.
      • Dec 3, 2013
    • More »

    Copyright © 2014 Style Weekly
    Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
    All rights reserved
    Powered by Foundation