<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Taxing Us
    
      by Nancy Finch</title>
      <link>http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/taxing-us/Content?oid=1638468</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Rss.xml?oid=1638468&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Taxing Us
    
      by Nancy Finch</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Style Weekly. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Style Weekly readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Style Weekly.</copyright>
      <webMaster>Colby.Rogers@pilotonline.com (Style Weekly Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:30:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Taxing Us]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/taxing-us/Content?oid=1638468&show=comments#1640000]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/taxing-us/Content?oid=1638468&show=comments#1640000]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[If the poor, Hispanic and African Americans who are a high percentage of the county would vote maybe they could make a difference and get some progressive candidates elected. Conservatives = greedy.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:20:58 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Taxing Us]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/taxing-us/Content?oid=1638468&show=comments#1639811]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/taxing-us/Content?oid=1638468&show=comments#1639811]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[leclerct]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[What is stopping Ms. Finch and those that feel the way she does from stroking that check to the locality, state or federal government over and above her current tax burden? If they feel the government can better utilize the funds then pony up!
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Profile?oid=1392856">leclerct</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:59:10 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Taxing Us]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/taxing-us/Content?oid=1638468&show=comments#1639724]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/taxing-us/Content?oid=1638468&show=comments#1639724]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Nancy Finch's opinion piece is complete bunk. Most noteworthy is her statement: "education, transportation, health care or any of the work government does that we can’t do for ourselves."
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:33:34 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Taxing Us]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/taxing-us/Content?oid=1638468&show=comments#1638618]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/taxing-us/Content?oid=1638468&show=comments#1638618]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Trey]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Paying more taxes is not a solution. Making government spending efficient is.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Trey]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:32:51 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Taxing Us]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/taxing-us/Content?oid=1638468&show=comments#1638614]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/taxing-us/Content?oid=1638468&show=comments#1638614]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Clark W Griswold Jr.]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The problem for me, and many others I suspect, is not that we're against paying higher taxes per se, it's that the significant amount we're already paying is being wasted. I live in the city and pay thousands in property taxes each year.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Profile?oid=1638613">Clark W Griswold Jr.</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:17:03 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Taxing Us]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/taxing-us/Content?oid=1638468&show=comments#1638513]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/taxing-us/Content?oid=1638468&show=comments#1638513]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[It's a grey future. Overwhelming numbers of Baby Boomers who are solely concerned about their retirement will continue to look away from the crises and outvote younger generations.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:33:56 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



