<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Noise Law Returns?
    
      by Vernal Coleman</title>
      <link>http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Rss.xml?oid=1548842&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Noise Law Returns?
    
      by Vernal Coleman</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Style Weekly. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Style Weekly readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Style Weekly.</copyright>
      <webMaster>Colby.Rogers@pilotonline.com (Style Weekly Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:45:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Noise Law Returns?]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1647800]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1647800]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[City Hall Review]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Thank you Mr. Samuels?<br>
<br>
<a href="http://cityhallreview.com/2011/09/21/review-samuels-tyler-nose-ordinances/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://cityhallreview.com/2011/09/21/revie&hellip;</a>
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Profile?oid=1596905">City Hall Review</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 03:47:23 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Noise Law Returns?]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1647512]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1647512]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[peace and quiet....please]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Many of you, I hope, are not living next to people who use their personal car's stereo as wall/floor/picture shaker, as I do. Something has to give!
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          peace and quiet....please]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:30:04 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Noise Law Returns?]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1569044]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1569044]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Citizen Jane]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I'd be interested in a CONSTITUTIONAL and so-called 'civilized' ordinance, Idiotsville. Who don't you post links to the ordinances you like so much in those other cities?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Profile?oid=1531819">Citizen Jane</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 22:16:56 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Noise Law Returns?]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1568217]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1568217]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Idiotsville]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[...and predictably the usual Wingnuts are crawling out of the woodwork (most of 'em probably work for this rag). God forbid Richmond City have any semblance of a civilized noise ordinance...like Norfolk, Va. Beach, Alexandria, Fairfax etc...
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Idiotsville]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:14:20 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Noise Law Returns?]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1565413]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1565413]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Citizen Jane]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I would like to hear less mindless noise from Samuels and the other members of city Council who clearly think this is the most important thing on their plates when we have millions of dollars being wasted on so-called "construction management" companies and contracts to the Mayor's best friends.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Profile?oid=1531819">Citizen Jane</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 08:32:42 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Noise Law Returns?]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1554492]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1554492]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[citytaxpayorrichmond]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Now that this Samuels,and the city was faced by so much opposItion by business owners(and the courts),they have dropped enforcement in any zoning areas other than residential areas. Making this proposal again unconstitutional, since this B.S. in only being forced on residential neighborhoods.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Profile?oid=1554489">citytaxpayorrichmond</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:17:58 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Noise Law Returns?]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1554490]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1554490]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[citytaxpayorrichmond]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[This is just total nonsense by that nut Samuels. It is more erosion of our American rights.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Profile?oid=1554489">citytaxpayorrichmond</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:07:50 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Noise Law Returns?]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1554187]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1554187]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Wants Peace and Quiet]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I don't care about noise from barking dogs, lawnmowers, trucks, even live bands. Just craft an ordinance that ends the aggravating booming car stereo scourge.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Wants Peace and Quiet]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:38:42 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Noise Law Returns?]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1550658]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1550658]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Rick James]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I wonder if they are going to exempt city buses and firetrucks.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Profile?oid=1469702">Rick James</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:59:15 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Noise Law Returns?]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1549085]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/noise-law-returns/Content?oid=1548842&show=comments#1549085]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[City taxpayer]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Does this mean that finally the Squirrels won't be able to shoot off fireworks at 10pm or later on a school night? If not, then this noise ordinance is worthless in my opinion.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Profile?oid=1453442">City taxpayer</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:33:03 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



