<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Good Composer, Bad Composer</title>
      <link>http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/good-composer-bad-composer/Content?oid=1383774</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Rss.xml?oid=1383774&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Good Composer, Bad Composer</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Style Weekly. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Style Weekly readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Style Weekly.</copyright>
      <webMaster>Colby.Rogers@pilotonline.com (Style Weekly Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:30:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Good Composer, Bad Composer]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/good-composer-bad-composer/Content?oid=1383774&show=comments#1396293]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/good-composer-bad-composer/Content?oid=1383774&show=comments#1396293]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[A. Wiles]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I'd like to offer an alternative opinion of this production, for whatever it might be worth. Please visit my site to read my review:<br><br>http://tinyurl.com/rsamadeus<br><br>Respectfully,<br><br>A. Wiles
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          A. Wiles]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Good Composer, Bad Composer]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/good-composer-bad-composer/Content?oid=1383774&show=comments#1395699]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/good-composer-bad-composer/Content?oid=1383774&show=comments#1395699]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I was actually amazed at how generous the reviewer was with this production. I found it terribly acted and shoddily staged.<br>As for undergarments accuracy, I can't imagine anyone really cares.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Good Composer, Bad Composer]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/good-composer-bad-composer/Content?oid=1383774&show=comments#1396146]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/good-composer-bad-composer/Content?oid=1383774&show=comments#1396146]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Note that this review is one person's opinion. And not one that I disagree with.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Good Composer, Bad Composer]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/good-composer-bad-composer/Content?oid=1383774&show=comments#1398042]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/good-composer-bad-composer/Content?oid=1383774&show=comments#1398042]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[So I was curious as to what bee flew up into Ms. Burruss' bonnet, and had to discover the facts for myself. Surely, I believed, she had done copious amounts of research before placing such negative emphasis on Richmond Shakespeare's costume ladies inattention to temporal detail.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Good Composer, Bad Composer]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/good-composer-bad-composer/Content?oid=1383774&show=comments#1399144]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/good-composer-bad-composer/Content?oid=1383774&show=comments#1399144]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I would have to agree with the latter comments however, there is only so much innovation that can be accomplished with an alleyway theatre. I think the staging was appropriate, with the unavoidable sightline problems.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



