<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Controversial Fence Splits City Review Board, Preservationist</title>
      <link>http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/controversial-fence-splits-city-review-board-preservationist/Content?oid=1383482</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Rss.xml?oid=1383482&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Controversial Fence Splits City Review Board, Preservationist</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Style Weekly. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Style Weekly readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Style Weekly.</copyright>
      <webMaster>Colby.Rogers@pilotonline.com (Style Weekly Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 11:30:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Controversial Fence Splits City Review Board, Preservationist]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/controversial-fence-splits-city-review-board-preservationist/Content?oid=1383482&show=comments#1397517]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/controversial-fence-splits-city-review-board-preservationist/Content?oid=1383482&show=comments#1397517]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[It appears to me that CAR needs to be overhauled. In our historic neighborhoods, we should be ENCOURAGING construction / restoration / additions that are in keeping with the historic period we're attempting to preserve.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Controversial Fence Splits City Review Board, Preservationist]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/controversial-fence-splits-city-review-board-preservationist/Content?oid=1383482&show=comments#1393831]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/controversial-fence-splits-city-review-board-preservationist/Content?oid=1383482&show=comments#1393831]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[So, is the answer that we simply abolish both and let freedom reign?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Controversial Fence Splits City Review Board, Preservationist]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/controversial-fence-splits-city-review-board-preservationist/Content?oid=1383482&show=comments#1395752]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/controversial-fence-splits-city-review-board-preservationist/Content?oid=1383482&show=comments#1395752]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Matt]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Give it a rest, Nan. Has your definition of "terrorism" been dumbed down to this level now?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Matt]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Controversial Fence Splits City Review Board, Preservationist]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/controversial-fence-splits-city-review-board-preservationist/Content?oid=1383482&show=comments#1397932]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/controversial-fence-splits-city-review-board-preservationist/Content?oid=1383482&show=comments#1397932]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Consider the other half of this- the other decision by City Council was to ok developer's plans despite neighborhood and CAR opposition.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Controversial Fence Splits City Review Board, Preservationist]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/controversial-fence-splits-city-review-board-preservationist/Content?oid=1383482&show=comments#1398324]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/controversial-fence-splits-city-review-board-preservationist/Content?oid=1383482&show=comments#1398324]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Nan]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Sorry,  Acorn was a typo but I stand by my comments.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Nan]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Controversial Fence Splits City Review Board, Preservationist]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/controversial-fence-splits-city-review-board-preservationist/Content?oid=1383482&show=comments#1398429]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/controversial-fence-splits-city-review-board-preservationist/Content?oid=1383482&show=comments#1398429]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Nan]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[CAR and acorn are heading towards fanaticism, extreme selfishness and civic terrorism. They leave no room for compromise.<br><br>
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Nan]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



