<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Caught Looking
    
      by Scott Bass</title>
      <link>http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Rss.xml?oid=1369559&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Caught Looking
    
      by Scott Bass</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Style Weekly. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Style Weekly readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Style Weekly.</copyright>
      <webMaster>Colby.Rogers@pilotonline.com (Style Weekly Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:15:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1393789]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1393789]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Fourth Estate Fan]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[FanGuy, My, oh, my, you are such a silly guy! <br><br>The same complaint could be said regarding the Shockoe Bottom site, hence the many-splendored dreams of building restaurants etc. etc. and using the stadium as a anchor to bring in business development.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Fourth Estate Fan]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1395500]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1395500]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[FanGuy]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Fourth, several reasons for my opinion.<br><br>1)  Due to the floodplain, the empty swath of land in the Bottom upon which they proposed a ballpark cannot be developed unless there is a large development like a ballpark. Quite simply, federal law prohibits it.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          FanGuy]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1398516]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1398516]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[FanGuy]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Fourth, you have something to refute that? Unless you are counting Bill's Barbecue, the storage place, or Greyhound, that is DEAD ON.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          FanGuy]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1398983]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1398983]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Richmond Newbie]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Wow. As someone who has never read any comments in Style before, I'd like to suggest that FanGuy and Fourth Estate Fan meet somewhere in public and get your aggression out once and for all.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Richmond Newbie]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1395067]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1395067]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[FanGuy is a bully, similar in manner to Sean Hannity or Bill O'Reilly. He has repeatedly stated that the area along the Boulevard/Diamon is akin to a wasteland.<br><br>I appreciate that 4th stands up to him and tries to reason with him.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1394517]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1394517]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Fourth Estate Fan]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA["I don't know why people want to waste taxpayer money on a location that failed to generate any development along the Boulevard in the more than 40 years baseball was played there, and that has otherwise utterly failed to bring new revenues to the City."<br><br>Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:02:42 PM by FanGuy <br><br>The are many more examples of this in threads that are on Church Hill People's News.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Fourth Estate Fan]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397989]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397989]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[FanGuy]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[4th Estate, I didn't ask for "each and every disparaging remark," I just want ONE example. You can't give it.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          FanGuy]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1398839]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1398839]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[FanGuy]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Jason Roop, er, I mean FourthEstate, cite me an example of disparaging the Boulevard? I have had nothing but complimentary things to say about Movieland and Stronghill dining.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          FanGuy]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1395451]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1395451]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Fourth Estate Fan]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[FanGuy, <br><br>There you go again. It would be great if you were as all-knowing and smart as you pretend to be.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Fourth Estate Fan]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1398195]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1398195]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Fourth Estate Fan]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[FanGuy, For the record, I am not Jason Roop. Nor am I ignorant of libel law and I will not dredge up and repeat each and every disparaging remark YOU have posted demeaning the Boulevard and the businesses in Scott's Addition.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Fourth Estate Fan]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397052]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397052]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[In response to  NotTHATFanGuy:  I personally would rather see the Bottom modernized and brought back to pre- Gaston days first before the city goes about trying to re-invent the Diamond. History implies past, and the area around the Diamond is currently an industrial district which is prospering quite well.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1394933]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1394933]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Northsider]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[FanGuy:  Who paid for those studies? Isn't it true that whoever pays the fiddler gets to call the tune?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Northsider]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397954]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397954]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[FanGuy]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[4th Estate, shouldn't you be working on your next article for Style? <br><br>You can bury your head in "journalism 101" all you would like, the fact remains that this piece is an editorial, not a news piece.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          FanGuy]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397151]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397151]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Fourth Estate Fan]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[FanGuy, <br>Anyone who reads these pages knows that you consistently take cheap shots at Style that are baseless. Your attacks on this newspaper, its reporters and editors reveal much about what you do not know about journalism.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Fourth Estate Fan]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397021]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397021]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[FanGuy]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[NotThat  Interesting that you would mention "higher use," because multiple studies have found that the highest and best use of the Boulevard location is NOT baseball. <br><br>Read the Crupi report and read the Davenport study from 2008.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          FanGuy]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1394751]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1394751]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[FanGuy]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Fourth Estate, read the RTD article:<br><br>Regarding Domino's take on the issue    "He doesn't want the franchise's willingness to upgrade The Diamond, however, to be interpreted as operators' satisfaction with the facility as a long-term solution."<br><br>And you don't know what I do and don't know. But once again, thanks for the personal attack.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          FanGuy]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1396350]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1396350]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Sooner or later Richmond will get a new ball park. The area surrounding the Diamond is just not a good fit for any ballpark.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Anonymous]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1395920]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1395920]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[NotTHATFanGuy]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Anonymous, how does one modernize a city if it does not put to higher use prime real estate that just happens to have a light industrial history.This area is a sports venue already with facilities such as the Sports Backers complex, Parker Field Annex, and the Aruthur Ashe Center. If the first RMA Diamond renovation plan had not been scuttled by City Hall bunglers, infrastructure/development gurus, and would be baseball tycoons we might have also had an olympic size swimming complex in that area.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          NotTHATFanGuy]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1395282]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1395282]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[FanGuy]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Northsider, how about you answer the question. Who paid for those studies?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          FanGuy]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1396578]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1396578]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[NotTHATFanGuy]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Hurrah! Baseball, professional baseball, for baseball fans, at an improved, great baseball park on the Boulevard.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          NotTHATFanGuy]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397167]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397167]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Fourth Estate Fan]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[*bringing* .... not bring. Pardon the poor typing.5
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Fourth Estate Fan]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397749]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1397749]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Fourth Estate Fan]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[You write:  "The Defenders are investing in the Diamond to get it usable again - nothing more. "<br><br>How do you know this?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Fourth Estate Fan]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Caught Looking]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1394838]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/caught-looking/Content?oid=1369559&show=comments#1394838]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[FanGuy]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[This article is so bent on saying "I told you so" that is misses the bigger point - which is that no one has said the Diamond is a permanent return destination. Even if a ballpark had been built in the Bottom, a new team would have had to play in the Diamond for at least another 2 seasons.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          FanGuy]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



