<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Port Takeover?
    
      by Peter Galuszka</title>
      <link>http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/port-takeover/Content?oid=1363902</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/Rss.xml?oid=1363902&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Port Takeover?
    
      by Peter Galuszka</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Style Weekly. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Style Weekly readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Style Weekly.</copyright>
      <webMaster>Colby.Rogers@pilotonline.com (Style Weekly Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Port Takeover?]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/port-takeover/Content?oid=1363902&show=comments#1396451]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/port-takeover/Content?oid=1363902&show=comments#1396451]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Port of Richmond fan]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[As far as I understand, the historical reason the city held onto the port was because if they didnt, the state would have neglected it and not pushed for the funds to keep the river dredged. If this happens, lets hope it doesnt mean LESS traffic at the port.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Port of Richmond fan]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Port Takeover?]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/port-takeover/Content?oid=1363902&show=comments#1398382]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/port-takeover/Content?oid=1363902&show=comments#1398382]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Glen Allen]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Sounds like something the big boys should really look into, they will probably want to spend a few hundred thousand dollars on a two years study first though.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Glen Allen]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.styleweekly.com">Style Weekly</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



