http://www.styleweekly.com/styleweekly/time-to-bring-on-the-bigger-dogs/Content?oid=1363005 Comments On: Time to Bring on the Bigger Dogs by Carol AOWolf en-us Copyright 2013 Style Weekly. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Style Weekly readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Style Weekly. Colby.Rogers@pilotonline.com (Style Weekly Webmaster) Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:01 -0400 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:00:00 -0400 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss
Perhaps the recalcitrance of the RPS administration and the School Board has more to do with *another* offer than it does with the Patrick Henry group?
Posted by Kids B4 Condos!]]> Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:00:00 -0400 Style Weekly
Perhaps the recalcitrance of the RPS administration and the School Board has more to do with *another* offer than it does with the Patrick Henry group?
Posted by Kids B4 Condos!]]> Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:00:00 -0400 Style Weekly
By attempting to point the finger at Wolf, you opened up a Pandora's box here and now other members of the School Board and the administration are being held accountable.
Posted by Eye-Witness]]> Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0400 Style Weekly Posted by Anonymous]]> Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0400 Style Weekly Posted by Anonymous2]]> Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0400 Style Weekly
Rather than "believing" and "assuming" that Wolf would vote "no," why didn't anyone bother to pick up the telephone and directly ask her which way she intended to vote?
Posted by Anonymous2]]> Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0400 Style Weekly Posted by RPS Teacher]]> Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0400 Style Weekly
From Another eye witness, read the minutes ...all of the "3" who recused themselves from the last vote on PHSSA did so because they had "voted NO!" on all previous votes for the current PHSSA charter!...IF you were there then you should have listed to what was said before they left. Maybe they "believed" C. Wolf would vote no because the ADA $$'s were not in the plan.
Posted by Anonymous]]> Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0400 Style Weekly Posted by An Eye-Witness]]> Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0400 Style Weekly
How about applying money to making sure that remaining RPS buildings are ADA-legal according to federal law?
Posted by Scott Burger]]> Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0400 Style Weekly Posted by Falcon]]> Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0400 Style Weekly Posted by Anonymous]]> Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0400 Style Weekly
HA! What professionals would those be?
Posted by RPS Teacher]]> Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0500 Style Weekly

Posted by One Observer who did some research]]> Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0500 Style Weekly Posted by RPS Leaders Lie]]> Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500 Style Weekly Posted by Anonymous]]> Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500 Style Weekly Posted by Falcon]]> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500 Style Weekly Posted by KBelle]]> Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500 Style Weekly Posted by Watching Closely]]> Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500 Style Weekly
After engineer and blogger extraordinaire, Jonathan Mallard, first reported that the RPS administration had failed to include PHSSA in the budget currently under consideration and Style Weekly's Chris Dovi asked some tough questions of RPS and reported about why PHSSA had been left entirely out of the budget, School Board chair Kimberly Bridges apologized to the PHSSA group for "the oversight." She vowed to do her part to improve communication between RPS and PHSSA.
Posted by Anonymous]]> Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500 Style Weekly
Did you click the link that shows how much money is being wasted by RPS on *design*?
Posted by RPS Parent No More]]> Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500 Style Weekly Posted by 'Rick Gray]]> Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500 Style Weekly Posted by Anonymous]]> Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500 Style Weekly