Letters 

Keep Your Eye On the Ballpark

The present ballpark proposal depends on public subsidy by diverting local taxes to pay off its debts ("Building a Village," News & Features, Feb. 16). Taxes are public money. And those taxes forgone by the city would have to be made up by all other existing businesses, residents and visitors.

How much longer will City Council allow itself to be bullied into subsidizing new grandiose developments, bringing extra costs and unfair competition down upon existing business firms, restaurants and shops — and driving the marginal out of town or to close?

Tony Pelling



Letters to the editor may be sent to: letters@styleweekly.com


Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

  • Re: In My Backyard

    • Fairly hysterical article.
      Way to fan the flame Mr. Brumfield, great idea keep it…

    • on May 22, 2013
  • Re: Letter: Redskins Help Rich

    • Yes, and VCU will eventually get a cheap football stadium when the Redskins leave

    • on May 22, 2013
  • Re: Dog Lovers Weigh in on Etiquette Essay

    • Thank Goodness for this discussion. I am beyond "over" people's dogs. Our local Forest Hill…

    • on May 21, 2013
  • More »
  • Facebook Recommendations

    Copyright © 2013 Style Weekly
    Richmond's alternative for news, arts, culture and opinion
    All rights reserved
    Powered by Foundation