I can agree with most of "Pedal Pushers" (Back Page, April 23), especially about using $500,000 for a purpose other than a redundant study. For example, let's use some to teach remedial driving. I'm 66 years old and try to walk about two and a half miles, five days a week; I intend to keep it up if I live! Hardly a walk goes by that I'm not nearly pancaked by a driver looking me straight in the eye who slides through a stop sign, cutting me off as I start to cross an intersection. I guess the drivers think that I am so stupid as to really believe that they were going to stop!
I live in Brandermill which has a wonderful system of paths; with the problems I have while having to use the streets for short distances, it's hard to imagine what people must put up with while using public streets. Richmond-area drivers need to drive in California for only about two days, where the pedestrian is king. The majority would be in deep kim-chee immediately if they dared make a turn if there were a pedestrian in the cross-walk. (Likewise, peds don't dare jaywalk!)
Re: Fat kids. I daresay the majority of kids these days are latch-key victims, whose parents won't let them leave the house after school. So, many children are simply furnished a couch, a TV (usually a large screen so the child(ren) won't be traumatized by a mere 19-inch screen), and Cokes and chips. If the parents would hide the remote, at least the kid would have to walk to the set to change channels and volume.
P.S. I recently got serious about my snackies and walking. In about 6 months I've lowered my cholesterol to 132 from 320 and my triglycerides to 74 from 400. I just hope the drivers will let me live to enjoy!
Dr. Dennis D. Flynn
Corrections
In the Word & Image (April 30), we incorrectly spelled the name Matthew Muhammad. In the same issue, Alison Auth's name was misspelled in a cutline ("Gardeners Unite," Street Talk).
Richmond should take the time to look a little deeper when borrowing from other cities. Claims made by proponents of new ballparks usually are overstated.
Style Weekly's mission is to provide smart, witty and tenacious coverage of Richmond. Our editorial team strives to reveal Richmond's true identity through unflinching journalism, incisive writing, thoughtful criticism, arresting photography and sophisticated presentation.
We make sense of the news; pursue those in power; explore the city's arts and culture; open windows on provocative ideas; and help readers know Richmond through its people. We give readers the information to make intelligent decisions.