LOGIN | REGISTER AS A USER


Article/Archives | Advanced Search

Style Weekly - Cover StoriesStyle Weekly - News & FeaturesStyle Weekly - ArtStyle Weekly - MusicStyle Weekly - MoviesStyle Weekly - Food & DrinkStyle Weekly - CalendarStyle Weekly - OpinionStyle Weekly - Classifieds
TWITTER  |  FACEBOOK  |  RSS HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  ABOUT US  |  ADVERTISE

Bookmark and Share

 
, Posted On: 10/13/2009

City Schools Submits False Expulsion Data



by Chris Dovi

The Richmond Public Schools are correcting falsely reported expulsion data submitted to the State Board of Education for the past five years. But what fallout may come from the misreported information remains unanswered.

The school administration submitted the data as part of its yearly reporting to the state. Posted on the state’s Web site along with similar data from the other school districts, the city schools report just one expulsion from 2004 through 2009.

Expulsion, defined as banning a pupil from city schools for an entire school year, shouldn’t be confused with suspensions, another troubling set of data for the Richmond system. In the 2007-2008 school year, Richmond schools, which have just fewer than 24,000 pupils, doled out 13,500 suspensions.

Former School Board member Carol A.O. Wolf, who sat on the discipline committee, pointed out the expulsion error in a letter to Superintendent Yvonne Brandon in July, a month before the district sent its corrected data to the state.

“I find it disturbing that there are so many excuses and so little accountability,” Wolf says. “If the RPS School Board fails to hold itself or the superintendent accountable, we can only hope that the state superintendent will.”

But school officials dispute that an error occurred.

“Technically, we didn’t report incorrect data,” Richmond Schools spokesman Alfonso Mathis writes in an e-mail, saying problems with an “internal [computer] system” meant “some of our information was being lost in the transition.”

The revised numbers show dozens of pupils expelled during each of those years, a total of 190 expulsions from 2004 through 2009. “Since our initial reporting to the State,” Mathis writes, “this situation has been rectified.”

Even the corrected numbers may have discrepancies. The numbers reported to the state for the most recent two years of reporting, according to Department of Education spokesman Charles Pyle, are not the same as the numbers provided to Wolf by the school district in response to a Freedom of Information Act request. The recently resubmitted figures currently available on the state Web site show 47 expulsions in 2007-2008 and 34 in 2008-2009, compared with 58 and 39 reported to Wolf.

Both the current superintendent, Yvonne Brandon, and former superintendent, Deborah Jewell-Sherman, signed off on the incorrect numbers sent to the state. There can be stiff penalties for supplying incorrect data to the state board because it affects distribution of state and federal funds. Failing to supply accurate data exposes superintendents to a variety of penalties, ranging from fines to suspension or removal from their jobs.

School Board Chairwoman Chandra Smith was unavailable for comment, but the board’s vice chairwoman, Kim Gray, says the matter “really concerns me.”

“I think that there are questions out there that are unanswered,” she says, indicating that it might be appropriate for the board to seek further information regarding the matter from Brandon: “There are questions worth probing.”


Articles/Archives:
  • Velvet Loses Liquor License
  • Twitter Bound
  • Brittney’s Ascent
  • Industrial Fumes
  • Geico Gecko Tags Richmond

Comment:
Monday, October 26, 2009 10:42:39 AM by Former Holton Parent
"The revised numbers show dozens of pupils expelled during each of those years, a total of 190 expulsions from 2004 through 2009. “Since our initial reporting to the State,” Mathis writes, “this situation has been rectified.”

Not according to the data on the VDOE website!

This is so strange. How can the Superintendent attack Style? Shouldn't she be making sure her people are doing the jobs they were hired to do?

Still, it took them 10-plus years to fix the roofs on brand-new schools, so I suppose it will take them another five years to correct this data?
Sunday, October 25, 2009 9:02:57 PM by Don Chandler
The key word here is 'accountability' and the Richmond Public Schools is ignorant to this word. There is NO accountability. From the teachers to the superintendent. Everyone blames inefficiency on computer 'glitches' or miscommunication in deadlines or something. There is always an excuse and someone pointing to someone else until problems just move away from Richmond.
Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:08:08 PM by Former RPS Mother
Unfortunately, the members of the previous school board (with the notable exception of Carol Wolf) trust the administration explicitly and frequently refer to RPS administrators as, ahem, "the experts." This current board (with the notable exception of Kim Gray) is in lock-step with the administration. Neither the board, nor the administration, appear to be capable of acting in the best interests of the children, or the taxpayers, of this city. Pity they can't be impeached. Or expelled.
Saturday, October 17, 2009 9:26:43 PM by Anonymous
Didn't anyone on the School Board or Discipline Committee review the data BEFORE it was reported. Certainly the Superintendent should have. It is obvious that those at the executive level of RPS are not doing a very good job of setting a good example to the children in the District. Are thjey capable?
Friday, October 16, 2009 3:33:06 PM by Anonymous
It would be news if Richmond Public Schools ever told the truth. Too bad administrators can't get expelled for lying.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:50:26 PM by Concerned Parent
This news cannot help but make one wonder what other data on the VDOE website is so colossally inaccurate?

Not only does someone need to ask Dr. Brandon to explain why it took RPS five years (!) to supply the correct data to the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE), but officials at VDOE to to be asked why they didn't do anything to ensure the accuracy of their data?

Given this sloppiness, how can anyone "trust" those soaring SOL scores across Virginia, if officials at VDOE don't even bother to analyse the data they require the districts to report?

Comment Box
 
Choose an identity
Registered Blogger Other
 
Username 
Password 
No Registered Blogger account? Sign up here.
CAPTCHA Validation
Retype the code from the picture
CAPTCHA Code Image
Speak the code Change the code