LOGIN | REGISTER AS A USER


Article/Archives | Advanced Search

Style Weekly - Cover StoriesStyle Weekly - News & FeaturesStyle Weekly - ArtStyle Weekly - MusicStyle Weekly - MoviesStyle Weekly - Food & DrinkStyle Weekly - CalendarStyle Weekly - OpinionStyle Weekly - Classifieds
TWITTER  |  FACEBOOK  |  RSS HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  ABOUT US  |  ADVERTISE

Bookmark and Share

 
, Posted On: 3/18/2009

Ballpark Analysis Conflicts With Shockoe Plan


Consultants conclude retail demand 60 percent lower than developer’s projections.
by Scott Bass

The Study
Click here to download a PDF file of the consultants' September 2008 ballpark study.

 

City Hall’s decision to hire the same consultants who previously concluded Shockoe Bottom was the best place for a new baseball stadium has some wondering if the game is rigged in favor of downtown baseball.

But it won’t be that easy. In the process of concluding that removing The Diamond from the Boulevard would open the area to potentially 305,000-square-feet of retail development, the consultants -- Davenport & Company, Chmura Economics & Analytics and Washington-D.C.-based Economics Research Associates -- performed a market demand analysis of both the Boulevard and Shockoe Bottom sites.

Their analysis found enough demand to generate $115 million in gross retail sales on the Boulevard. In the Bottom, they concluded there was demand for approximately 65,000 square feet of retail with gross sales of $26.5 million.

That’s a long way from 192,000 square feet of retail and more than $90 million in gross sales proposed by Highwoods Properties, the developer behind the $363 million ballpark development in Shockoe Bottom. While there are other components to the project, including condos, office buildings and a hotel, the proposed retail development is key to making the numbers work.

Retail sales, including restaurants, generate the lion’s share of the tax revenue in the proposal, which would be diverted away from city coffers to pay for the $70 million ballpark. The developers are projecting that Shockoe Center will generate $6.59 million retail, admissions and meals taxes annually, or more than 73 percent of the revenue needed to cover the bond payments.

In a letter to city officials, Davenport & Co. says the upcoming feasibility study will focus on the Shockoe Bottom proposal, but adds that the new study “will build on the work previously completed” in the September report.

The September study’s main objective was to analyze the highest and best use of about 59 acres around The Diamond on the Boulevard. The consultants concluded that the Boulevard would generate a higher return to the city without The Diamond. But in doing so, the consultants also did a similar analysis of the Shockoe Bottom site.

Broken down, the consultants’ suggested “retail program” for the Bottom --which it completed after studying the area’s potential market demand -- includes 16,500 square feet of grocery and specialty foods retailers, 26,000 square feet of restaurant space and 22,750 square feet of “Neighborhood Services/ Drugstore/ Other.”

In addition to the discrepancy in Highwoods’ retail projections for Shockoe Center -- enough to generate more than $90 million in gross sales compared to the consultants’ expectation of $26.5 million in gross sales -- the amount of restaurant space is also drastically different. The consultants anticipate enough demand for about $11.7 million in gross sales, while Highwoods anticipates more than $28 million in restaurant sales.

To read the September 2008 study, click here.


Articles/Archives:
  • Richmond’s High-Speed Rail Plans Put on Hold
  • Amid Push for Options, Second Charter School Applies to Richmond
  • MeadWestvaco Flips the Switch, Dims the Lights
  • Elegba Folklore Sells Art for Haitian Relief
  • Lung Association Closes State Chapter

Comment:
Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:42:17 AM by Jeff E.
I wonder why an industrial/warehouse area would have greater retail potential than downtown? Is this simply suburbanites' fear of the City and if so should we continue to cave into the demands of the sprawl culture? Looking forward to seeing the results of the current study.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 8:42:56 PM by JoeRichmond
Style should sponsor a "Name the Team" contest ....

My pick: "The Boondoggles"
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:41:22 PM by Jason Roop
FanGuy, You don't have to wait! You can read the numbers for yourself, straight from Davenport! Just click on "The Study," above right, for the complete 100-plus page report. Hope you find the coverage illuminating.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:38:06 PM by FanGuy
I think I'll wait to see what Davenport has to say on this, thanks. Scott Bass has botched the numbers on Shockoe Center twice already. I wouldn't trust his analysis on this if they were paying HIM $100,000 to get it right.

Comment Box
 
Choose an identity
Registered Blogger Other
 
Username 
Password 
No Registered Blogger account? Sign up here.
CAPTCHA Validation
Retype the code from the picture
CAPTCHA Code Image
Speak the code Change the code