LOGIN | REGISTER AS A USER


Article/Archives | Advanced Search

Style Weekly - Cover StoriesStyle Weekly - News & FeaturesStyle Weekly - ArtStyle Weekly - MusicStyle Weekly - MoviesStyle Weekly - Food & DrinkStyle Weekly - CalendarStyle Weekly - OpinionStyle Weekly - Classifieds
TWITTER  |  FACEBOOK  |  RSS  | THE SCOOP HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  ABOUT US  |  ADVERTISE

Bookmark and Share

 
, Posted On: 3/3/2009

Restore Creek in Shockoe Bottom?



by Chris Dovi

Forget baseball, what Richmond’s downtown needs is another water feature.

So goes the reasoning of David Herring, executive director of the Alliance to Conserve Old Richmond Neighborhoods. He proposes exhuming Shockoe Creek, a flood-prone stream that once flowed through the center of the city’s oldest district.

“What if instead of trying to fight nature, what if we restored nature?” suggests Herring, offering the idea as an alternative to a Shockoe Bottom ballpark. He says restoring the creek would also solve the Bottom’s flooding issues. 

“We’re trying to tame this thing that’s been untamable since they’ve been building buildings,” says Herring, whose preservation group has been a vocal critic of the proposed ballpark, citing concerns it might pave over an area where Richmond became a center of the antebellum slave trade.

In addition to providing a channel for stormwater, Herring muses, his proposal has another practical purpose. He sees it as a centerpiece to a resurgent downtown market district that could be coupled with historic interpretation — and possibly a national slavery museum.

“Richmond has never gambled on tourism — we’ve always gambled on these wonky projects [like the Shockoe baseball proposal],” he says, envisioning a lined water walk not unlike the desolate Canal Walk. Except that unlike the canal, “you could have all sorts of [commercial] development along the [Shockoe Creek].”

Good thought, suggests fellow historian Jeffrey Ruggles with the Virginia Historical Society, but a bit impractical.

“It’d be no more difficult than rerouting I-95, I guess,” Ruggles says, noting an engineering nightmare that’d come along with sorting human waste from storm runoff since what remains of Shockoe Creek is now “one of the largest combined sewers in the country.”


Articles/Archives:
  • French Lick
  • Easy Credit
  • Cusack Becomes Poe, Just Not in Richmond
  • Cooch Loses Round One in U.Va. Probe
  • Double-Dip Recession? Blame the Unspent Stimulus Money

Comment:
Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:06:16 PM by shkbtm
Talk about taxpayer dollars being spent wisely... how much do you think exhuming a creek would cost exactly? And how exactly does a creek pay taxes? Bass tournaments? Heck for that amount of money we could get a Major League Football team.
Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:19:45 AM by Jeff E.
Sounded interesting until that little bit of reality at the end. That would cost many times the amount needed to make infrastructure improvements for the stadium development. Interesting idea though. I visualized it running right through the middle of a new, multi-level farmers market though I guess in reality it would be closer to the train station?
Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:12:34 PM by WS
Any chance you could put a picture of shockoe bottom on here. and draw an image of where the creek is. I'd be curious where in the bottom the creek would run. (near the farmer's market, etc) Hard to tell just from an article. a picture would help. thanks

Comment Box
 
Choose an identity
Registered Blogger Other
 
Username 
Password 
No Registered Blogger account? Sign up here.
CAPTCHA Validation
Retype the code from the picture
CAPTCHA Code Image
Speak the code Change the code