LOGIN | REGISTER AS A USER


Article/Archives | Advanced Search

Style Weekly - Cover StoriesStyle Weekly - News & FeaturesStyle Weekly - ArtStyle Weekly - MusicStyle Weekly - MoviesStyle Weekly - Food & DrinkStyle Weekly - CalendarStyle Weekly - OpinionStyle Weekly - Classifieds
TWITTER  |  FACEBOOK  |  RSS  | THE SCOOP HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  ABOUT US  |  ADVERTISE

Bookmark and Share

 
, Posted On: 9/15/2009

Unspeakable


We would all be remiss if we ignored that it was the first message to schoolchildren from America’s first black president, who was the first to endure this parental and political scrutiny.
by Terone B. Green
 

In 1988, President Ronald Reagan told America’s schoolchildren: “In the area of education you have a responsibility to try to learn and care about scientific and intellectual inquiry. The world is an increasingly competitive place. And if we’re to compete, we’ll have to do it with brainpower — your brainpower. So, keep learning and hit those books.”

In 1991, President George H.W. Bush told America’s schoolchildren: “When it comes to your own education, what I’m saying is take control. Don’t say school is boring and blame it on your teachers. Make your teachers work hard. Tell them you want a first-class education. Tell them that you’re here to learn.”

Then, in 2009, President Barack Obama told America’s schoolchildren: “We can have the most dedicated teachers, the most supportive parents, the best schools in the world — and none of it will make a difference, none of it will matter unless all of you fulfill your responsibilities, unless you show up to those schools, unless you pay attention to those teachers, unless you listen to your parents and grandparents and other adults and put in the hard work it takes to succeed.”

These three presidents of the United States represent two different political parties, were born in three different states and grew up in three different generations. Yet they have clearly spoken the same message in practically the same language: aiming to inspire excellence and high goals in America’s schoolchildren.

In short, children bring out the best in all of us.

Yet, that synonymous message, that unity of vision and compassion for our nation’s children is what many of America’s parents, pundits and politicians appeared to have missed last week as President Obama prepared to deliver his “National Address to America’s Schoolchildren.” Acting to many as father in chief, his message no doubt affected the lives of thousands of children who might otherwise not have heard a message of hope to even get them past the first day.

But instead of welcoming this speech, the insatiable thirst for robust political debate and controversy seized the airways and obstructed the president’s intentions to — like other presidents — simply inspire America’s children to work hard and set goals. His expressed intent was squelched by allegations that he would spread so-called socialist views and politicize the minds of children.

It appears to have been the adults who simply failed to do their homework on this one. As a father — also with two daughters in elementary school — I’m the first to say that children can never be encouraged enough.

Even former first lady Laura Bush supported President Obama’s speech to the nation’s schoolchildren. Succinctly, she said, it is “really important for everyone to respect the president of the United States.”

Especially this month, Mrs. Bush’s comments bring back clear memories of 9/11, and how on that tragic day, it was inside a classroom with students at the Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Fla., that President George W. Bush got the horrible message, “America is under attack.”

Before that moment, his visit to the school had been an uneventful, typical day of his presidency. There were no outcries from Democrats or Republicans in anticipation of what he would say. Neither were there such outcries when Reagan and the elder Bush prepared to speak years ago.

So, given that past presidents have imparted practically the same message to America’s schoolchildren, what in this instance was different?

I acknowledge that there were some good excuses for arguing against the speech — the first day of school is a busy one, and that it would be held around lunchtime for some. But we would all be remiss if we ignored that it was the first message to schoolchildren from America’s first black president who was the first to endure this parental and political scrutiny.

The vehement advance criticism of the speech, coupled with the political rancor of the days that followed, gives more evidence that perhaps race was indeed a glaring factor. The unprecedented outburst, “You lie!” from South Carolina Congressman Joe Wilson during the president’s health-care speech the very next evening underscores the climate of unique disrespect for this president by certain segments of American society.

If we as Americans are willing to acknowledge this truth, then there’s a greater lesson for us all — children and adults alike. That lesson is that no matter how long children stay in school, how much goal-setting they do and no matter how many barriers they ultimately break, these disparate attacks on America’s first black president reveal a social immaturity entrenched within our nation that will continue to destroy the very foundation on which we expect our children to stand. Children do what they see. And if this disrespect continues, the problem of the 21st century, as stated by W.E.B. Du Bois, only will continue to be “the color line.” S

Terone B. Green is a former president of the Richmond Crusade for Voters, past board chairman of the Richmond Urban League and a member of the Richmond Business Council.

Opinions expressed on the Back Page are those of the writer and not necessarily those of Style Weekly.

 


 


Articles/Archives:
  • When Chains Break
  • Poisoned Pen
  • Lower Learning
  • Justification Without Justice
  • The Real Racists

Comment:
Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:23:54 AM by Anonymous
Wow, what a misinformed article, as proven by the commenters, who have clearly shown that Democrats were more than willing to attack the content of Bush Sr's message to schoolchildren. If you're going to engage in race-baiting, at least get the story right.
Monday, September 21, 2009 6:27:05 PM by Paul H
FanGuy,

Jimmy Carter has hardly spent the last 40 years in an ivory towee, being 70 plus has nothing to do with anything, He's 80 plus by the way. I don't agree with him, but he speaks from decades of experience in the deep South and carries a certain amount of credibility with him and calling him ignorant is just plain, well you figure it out.
-----------------------------
Downtown Richmond, VA
Monday, September 21, 2009 5:27:29 PM by Fourth Estate Fan
FanGuy, Hah! You are the Master of the Mean when it comes to attacking other posters and the reporters at Style Weekly. Suffice to say, the "lesson" you attempt to foist upon me is best understood in the context of the old saying: "We teach best the lessons we need most to learn ourselves." So, thanks for the lesson "Teach" and know that I will never allow you to bully me with faulty logic or use faulty syllogisms to mislead others. What a hoot you are!
Monday, September 21, 2009 4:34:12 PM by Anonymous
Wow, what a misinformed article, as proven by the commenters, who have clearly shown that Democrats were more than willing to attack the content of Bush Sr's message to schoolchildren. If you're going to engage in race-baiting, at least get the story right.
Thursday, September 17, 2009 8:16:51 AM by FanGuy
Fourth Estate,

You continue to do little other than post vile personal attacks directed toward other posters in this forum.

As to your point about Carter, I hardly think that a 70 plus year old man who was President and thus spent the greater part of the last 40 years in an ivory tower is best able to speak for what motivates the majority of Americans - regardless of the fact he was born in Georgia - and he's certainly no more qualified to offer such an opinion than a white male living in Richmond Virginia.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009 11:30:43 PM by Scott Burger
"The only people who will complain are the ones from the opposite party"

Not true.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009 10:46:03 PM by Anonymous
Kids always benefit from a positive message from an authority. Every President should do this. Every year, no matter what party he/she is from. The only people who will complain are the ones from the opposite party, as documented by the many posts before mine. Let's be reasonable, people.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009 9:43:02 PM by Anonymous
Wrong again.

"Unlike the Obama speech, in 1991 most of the controversy came after, not before, the president's school appearance. The day after Bush spoke, the Washington Post published a front-page story suggesting the speech was carefully staged for the president's political benefit. "The White House turned a Northwest Washington junior high classroom into a television studio and its students into props," the Post reported.

With the Post article in hand, Democrats pounced. "The Department of Education should not be producing paid political advertising for the president, it should be helping us to produce smarter students," said Richard Gephardt, then the House Majority Leader. "And the president should be doing more about education than saying, 'Lights, camera, action.'""
Wednesday, September 16, 2009 8:24:01 PM by teroneG
The democratic investigation of President Bush did not center on the contents of his message.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009 3:52:24 PM by Anonymous

I am shocked that the author didn't know that when Bush Sr. wanted to give a speech to schoolchildren, the DEMOCRATS investigated and HELD HEARINGS on it. Therefore your claim that this is the "first" time a school speech has been politically scrutinized is completely false. Please get your facts straight next time.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/When-Bush-spoke-to-students-Democrats-investigated-held-hearings-57694347.html
Wednesday, September 16, 2009 3:29:00 PM by Scott Burger
"We would all be remiss if we ignored that it was the first message to schoolchildren from America’s first black president, who was the first to endure this parental and political scrutiny."

Point taken....on the other hand, I am not a vehement right winger and I am not trying to make too big a deal of this, but we would all ALSO be remiss if we ignored the idea that maybe politicians should not be speaking directly to school children, period.

Maybe it would be better if politicians should instead just INDIRECTLY influence school kids by being a good role model and speaking directly to citizens in general about education as a priority.

Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:50:59 PM by Anonymous
"We would all be remiss if we ignored that it was the first message to schoolchildren from America’s first black president, who was the first to endure this parental and political scrutiny."

That statement is completely false as another poster noted. George HW Bush was investigated via hearings about his school speech, yet I'm guessing Tyrone had no problem with that.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:30:57 PM by Fourth Estate Fan
FanGuy,

When it comes to identifying racism, I submit that a white male from Plains, Georgia just might be a bit better able to call it than you are. And, as far as running ignorant mouths, don't worry: you clearly retain the title.

Just because Bush caught hell from the Dems for his speech, doesn't make what happened to Obama's speech right. Further, guys like Bush have been telling white, anglo-saxon males for years that they have to work hard if they want to make a difference in their own lives and in our world.

I don't recall Bush having any street cred at all when it comes to speaking to the millions of at-risk African-American children in this nation.

As long as Obama continues to be identified as our nation's "first black president" we are all guilty of failing to see the BIG picture. Obama is this nation's first BLACK and WHITE president. The sooner we start realizing that, the sooner we can start to put the lynch-mob mentality in its proper perspective.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009 9:25:48 AM by Anonymous
I am shocked that the author didn't know that when Bush Sr. wanted to give a speech to schoolchildren, the DEMOCRATS investigated and HELD HEARINGS on it. Therefore your claim that this is the "first" time a school speech has been politically scrutinized is completely false. Please get your facts straight next time.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/When-Bush-spoke-to-students-Democrats-investigated-held-hearings-57694347.html
Wednesday, September 16, 2009 8:19:39 AM by FanGuy
I think it would be foolish to ignore that Obama's own people helped create this mess by releasing a lesson plan asking kids to write letters to Obama about how they can help him. Not saying that was the primary motivating factor for some of the opposition, but it didn't help. The final speech that he gave, which no doubt was shaped somewhat by the controversy that proceeded it, was very good.

What we must avoid is using racism to justify any opposition to Obama's policies. We will never move past race if racism is blamed for all of the opposition to Obama's policies. In that regard, Jimmy Carter once again has done his country a disservice by running his ignorant mouth.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009 6:22:32 AM by Anonymous
People disagree with Bush and they are patriots, disagree with Obama and you are a racist. Nice
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 9:29:58 PM by Carol A.O. Wolf
Excellent commentary, Terone!
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 9:02:45 PM by Terone Green
I am a former member of the Richmond Business Council..........Terone B. Green

Comment Box
 
Choose an identity
Registered Blogger Other
 
Username 
Password 
No Registered Blogger account? Sign up here.
CAPTCHA Validation
Retype the code from the picture
CAPTCHA Code Image
Speak the code Change the code