LOGIN | REGISTER AS A USER


Article/Archives | Advanced Search

Style Weekly - Cover StoriesStyle Weekly - News & FeaturesStyle Weekly - ArtStyle Weekly - MusicStyle Weekly - MoviesStyle Weekly - Food & DrinkStyle Weekly - CalendarStyle Weekly - OpinionStyle Weekly - Classifieds
TWITTER  |  FACEBOOK  |  RSS  | THE SCOOP HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  ABOUT US  |  ADVERTISE

Bookmark and Share

 
, Posted On: 5/4/2010

Divining Providence


Bill and Sue Frankel-Streit are parents, Catholics, felons and anarchists. It’s all part of their mission to serve God.
by Amy Biegelsen
 

 

BILL FRANKEL-STREIT and his wife, Sue, did not fight once during their first year of marriage, largely because the state of New York was holding them in separate prisons.

Their imprisonment, and arguably their marriage, stem from the way they celebrated New Year’s Eve 1991. That night Bill and Sue, along with two others, broke into Griffiss Air Force Base in Rome, N.Y.

They’d spent considerable time scoping the base in advance, but made it on the grounds only twice before: once to attend a public air show and again for an unauthorized, self-guided tour after hooking an invitation to attend mass at the military chapel. So on New Year’s Eve, after they cleared the barbed-wire fence and the perimeter road, evaded circulating watch vehicles and cut through a chain-link barrier, they were surprised to find an electric fence.

 
American military forces were 15 days away from beginning the air strikes against Iraq during the Persian Gulf War and the base was on alert. “We thought it was just blasphemous,” says Bill, who was ordained as a Roman Catholic priest in 1982.

Once they cut the fence, it was only a matter of time until someone noticed. By some miracle, the current wasn’t running through the fence at that exact moment and they cut the wire and passed into one of the most heavily guarded sectors on the base.

“When you go with faith the waters part,” Bill says.

Their quarry loomed: a nuclear armed B-52 bomber. They raised the claw hammers they brought along and began banging on the side of the plane. When the guards came, they offered no resistance. The Syracuse Post-Standard, which ran more than 30 articles covering the action and subsequent trial, reported that the base’s top security officers were removed from their jobs after the incident.

That night, Bill and Sue joined a tradition of anti-war activists, often Catholic, who have committed dozens of similar protests worldwide since the 1980s, directly targeting the machines of war.

Called plowshares actions, they get their name from a familiar Bible verse, Isaiah 2:4 — “and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.”

“The plowshares action was like a sacrament for me,” Bill says. They spent the first two months of the year in jail and were temporarily released that spring. While out, they prepared their defense and got married, a decision that further altered Bill’s already strained relationship with the church hierarchy. They represented themselves in court, lost and spent the next year in jail — which was part of the point.

“I think he’s a model of what a married Catholic priest would be for the church,” says Sister Anne Montgomery, a nun who participated in the first plowshares action in 1980. She and seven others broke into the General Electric Nuclear Missile Re-entry Division in King of Prussia, Penn., and hammered on two of the warhead nosecones that were manufactured there. “He manages to give himself totally to his family and totally to disarmament work,” she says of Bill.

Twenty years and three children later, the couple remains committed to nonviolent protest. Bill’s been incarcerated so many times that last month he appeared in federal court in Washington not as a defendant but as an expert witness on the comparative conditions of different prisons.

Hearing about Bill’s life of resistance likely was a novelty for the judge and prosecutors that day, not to mention the defendant, who’d been convicted of multiple homicides and appeared a little startled at the beginning of his testimony.

Washington, in the aftermath of the health-care debate, was still echoing with accusations of radicalism (Socialism! Communism! Naked fascism!). The Catholic Church was in the news, too, as fresh revelations in the sexual-abuse scandal came to light. All the rhetoric about religion and radical politics, however, probably doesn’t conjure up the image of anyone like Bill Franklel-Streit — a living, breathing Catholic anarchist.


 

The Frankel-Streits rely on their abundant garden and, after a lengthy processing period, fertilize it with material that includes compost from their toilet.

BILL AND SUE live with their three teenage children on a sprawling property in Louisa County 60 miles outside Richmond. The parents are taut and wiry. Sue has a mane of salt and pepper hair and a big gold loop in her nose; Bill has a shaved head and walks with a limp because of a lingering hip injury. They dote on their children, who are taller and full-cheeked. Looking at them, you’d never guess their parents were felons.

They all live in a little farmhouse with a low ceiling that gives the place a cozy, conspiratorial feeling. There’s a composting toilet — just toss in some sawdust when you’re done — and one that flushes in case they’re ever putting up someone who is sick or elderly. As part of their commitment to serving their community, helping those in need and welcoming strangers, guests are constant.

They pick up odd jobs to pay the bills. Occasionally they’ll be invited to speak at a church or a college. Bill’s campus talks often draw an unlikely mix of “anarchists with piercings and tattoos all in black, and clean-cut Christian kids,” he says. He tells them the Bible is the original anarchist handbook and everybody freaks out.

They eat eggs from a mess of chickens they keep fenced off from a bountiful vegetable garden. When they go to the store to spend some of their $700 monthly budget of food stamps, they peek in the dumpster to see if anything good got tossed out. The kids have Medicare. Despite their opposition to the government, the Frankel-Streits figure if it does exist, they might as well take advantage, and being part of those programs means they live in solidarity with the poor.

Bill says their real insurance is “the community of people,” other activists like them, who routinely send food and clothes, and a handful of like-minded Catholics who occasionally tithe to them instead of the church.

They home-school the children: Isaac, 17, Anna, 15 and Gaby, 12. The girls are brainy and friendly and have learned to roll their eyes every bit as well as their suburban counterparts. Isaac has a close friend who lives over on the Twin Oaks commune, known for its homemade tofu and hammocks. They commiserate together about “growing up in community,” Bill says.

 

Bill Frankel-Streit and his fellow protestors have a standing Jan. 11 action to mark the anniversary of when the first detainees were brought to Guantanamo Bay. Photo courtesy of Jonah House

The kids take music lessons and play team sports thanks to an annual grant from the Rosenberg Fund for Children, an organization that gives money to the children of activists. The fund was started by the son of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, who were convicted with slipping atomic secrets to the Soviets, and then executed in June 1953.

The children have absorbed a lot of the social aspects of their parents’ lifestyle, but the religious content hasn’t taken as firm a hold. Sitting at a long wooden table in the kitchen, Gaby acknowledges that she doesn’t consider herself particularly Catholic. “We tried church in exchange for a puppy,” she says.

“I’m probably going to have random people living in my house no matter what I do,” Anna adds.

“I don’t care as long as they don’t drag me off to the White House at 6 in the morning,” Gaby says.

“Well, that’s the Pentagon,” Bill interjects. “The White House is usually more like noon.”

In January, the family took a tour of the Capitol. When they reached the Rotunda, Bill and some fellow protestors held a prayer vigil to commemorate four Guantanamo detainees. The government claimed the detainees had committed suicide, until a military whistleblower came forward and said they likely were killed at a Central Intelligence Agency secret site. The protesters were arrested and removed. Back downstairs, a ticket taker, who didn’t realize the children had been with them, apologized for the interruption and offered them free tickets.


BILL FRANKEL-STREIT grew up in Hazleton, Penn., and recalls a fairly straight-laced upbringing. “I grew up with a lot of deference for authority,” he says. When he saw on television that Martin Luther King Jr. was killed, he wondered why doctors were being shot.

As a kid he always looked up to one uncle in particular: a priest. Streit says he was drawn to the clergy because of their status. He’s since wondered if his uncle had been in the military whether he might not have followed him down that path too.

 

Bill Frankel-Streit is carried away in handcuffs at the nation’s Capitol. Photo courtesy of Jonah House

Bill went directly from high school to seminary. It was 1972, shortly after the Catholic Church had released the decrees of the Second Vatican Council, an internal effort to modernize itself and “arguably the most liberal time in the church,” he says, but Vatican II didn’t change everything. He was allowed to wear jeans to class, but he still got the distinct impression that his teachers and fellow students viewed lay people as second-class citizens rather than those they served.

Despite the not-quite-perfect-fit, Bill was ordained in 1982. He busied himself with homilies and weddings, but struck up a correspondence with Philip and Daniel Berrigan, brothers and radical priests.

The Berrigans are best known for their actions on May 17, 1968, when they burned stolen draft cards with homemade napalm — among the military’s weapons of choice during the Vietnam War. During the trial, Dan Berrigan read a statement. “Our apologies, good friends,” he said, “for the fracture of this good order, the burning of paper instead of children.”

The Berrigans went to jail, but it vaulted them to national stature. They appeared on the cover of Time magazine’s Jan. 25, 1971, issue and Gregory Peck produced a film based on the trial. The Berrigans remained such devoted protesters, Streit says, that guards at the Pentagon referred to both of them as Father Berrigan.

Through their correspondence, Bill became convinced that a true shepherd comforts the sick and dying, but also challenges people on war and racism and the death penalty. He began protesting and was arrested for the first time in 1985, much to the chagrin of the church hierarchy. In 1988 he took a leave of absence.

Bill moved to Washington, D.C., and joined a group home that named itself after Dorothy Day, an activist and journalist who began a newspaper aimed at all the Catholic workers who streamed into in New York during an influx of poor immigrants moving into the country. The first issue was published May 1, 1933 — 77 years ago this week.

 

As part of an annual observance of the opening of the Guantanamo Bay prison for suspected terrorists, in 2009 a group of activists fasted from Jan. 11 until President Obama’s inauguration, urging him to close the base. Although he signed an executive order to close the facility his first week in office, it has yet to be fully shut down. Photo courtesy of Jonah House

There was a strong history in Catholic social teaching of advocating for social justice causes such as poverty, housing, wages and especially nonviolence, says Susan Mountin, an adjunct assistant professor of theology at Marquette University.

“Very early on in the movement they found that they believed that acts of nonviolent civil disobedience were ways of calling attention to social injustice,” Mountin says. An early example was for Catholic Workers to refuse to go down into bomb shelters during the civil defense drills of the 1950s, and instead pray in local parks. (“Entertaining Angels,” a movie about Day’s life, was released in 1996 starring Moira Kelly and Martin Sheen, who has been active in social justice issues and has been arrested during protests dozens of times.)

Such radicals technically are a lay movement in the church, doing work rooted in the gospel, but not recipients of church funding like monks and nuns. “They have continued to say we are Catholic,” Mountin says, “and maybe even more Catholic.”

The big blue Dorothy Day House in Washington sits on a corner lot across the street from a rambling private park. Bill and about 30 others, activists and five formerly homeless families, lived and worked there together. There are close to 200 more of these homes and farms, known as hospitality houses, throughout the country.

One of Bill’s housemates was his future wife. 

Sue lived on the Maryland side of the Washington suburbs. “I kind of grew up in a Jewish, intellectual milieu,” she says, “so I didn’t really think people read the Bible.” She grew up with more of a post-Holocaust Jewish identity than one focused on religious and spiritual aspects.

One summer during college, she worked selling books door to door, a job that quickly became more of an anthropological experiment. She noticed that she could depend on a drink or a bathroom in the homes of the poorest families, while the richer ones would slam the door in her face.

“It was kind of my own little comprehension of capitalism and how wealth affects people’s level of hospitality,” she says. One of the books she was hawking was a Bible dictionary, which she began reading at night.

After college — and a year in Japan at a business journal where she edited former Chrysler Chief Executive Lee Iacocca’s occasional columns — she moved back to Washington and worked for a Japanese newspaper in the National Press Building downtown. She took the Metro from her mom’s house into the city and struck up a friendship with Mark, a homeless man who hung around her stop. One day she emerged from the Metro and found Mark with icicles hanging off his eyelashes. That was the final straw, she says. She wanted out of participating in the mainstream culture.

She’d learned about the Dorothy Day House and started cooking a community meal there once a week. Eventually she moved in. At first, Bill and Sue were just very close friends. “I was a priest,” he says, “so there was this whole to be or not to be thing.”

By the time they committed the Plowshares action in upstate New York, they had decided to get married knowing full well their honeymoon likely would be courtesy of the federal government. Bill says he saw the experience as a good thumbnail sketch of what a marriage should be: “risking your life together in faith, hope and love.”

After the airplane hammering they spent a few months in prison. The judge had offered to release them on their own personal recognizance, but “we really wanted to be in prison,” Bill says. “This was Phil [Berrigan’s] big thing. It heightens the witness.”

Shortly before the trial began, a judge in Syracuse, N.Y., married them.

The goal of the courtroom phase in a plowshares action is to try to turn the proceedings around and put the B-52 on trial. One way to do that is to try to get information about the weapon system in front of the jury, to quantify for them how much damage it can do, how many people it can kill. In return, the prosecution tries its best to limit what can be discussed by filing motions with the judge.

During the trial, every time the couple tried to ask a question about the B-52’s capacity, the prosecutors objected and eventually blocked most of the information they attempted to introduce in court. At one point the exchange became so heated that the judge sent the jury out of the courtroom and threatened all of them with contempt.

According to the Syracuse Post-Standard, the jury also wasn’t allowed to hear an hour’s worth of testimony offered by Ramsey Clark, U.S. attorney general under Lyndon B. Johnson. He had toured Iraq and discussed the death and destruction that B-52 bombers had wrought on the civilian population and infrastructure in Iraq.

Bill and Sue lost and spent the next 10 months in jail. In one fell swoop, Bill had become a married priest felon. (It’s a set of descriptors he’s a little uncomfortable with, especially after it was revealed that Rodney Lee Rodis, another Louisa County priest who was convicted last year for embezzling money from his church and had a secret family in Spotsylvania County — a very different sort of married priest felon.) Since then, Bill has carved out a new practice and expression of his faith.

“I do my preaching in court now,” he says. Instead of maps of the Holy Land, he’s familiarized himself with the placement and terrain of military bases, weapons systems and prisons. He still follows the Catholic calendar, but with a slightly different set of emphases.

 

Bill Frankel-Streit and fellow protestors held an Ash Wednesday service in front of the what they called the Injustice Department in 2006. Photo courtesy of Jonah House

“Good Friday, for me, instead of going to a church service, I act,” he says. “I go to the Pentagon and confront Caesar.” As part of his observance, he gets help from a sympathetic doctor who draws his blood. He stashes the sample in his freezer until it’s time. When Good Friday approaches, Bill thaws it out and drains it into a baby bottle. He takes it with him to the Pentagon where he literally spills his own blood. Typically, this gets him arrested. “The blood is already there,” he often says in court. “We’re just making it visible.”

For Bill, this is a “really truthful act” of laying down his life essence in the name of Christ. After all, he says, Jesus died for our sins, he didn’t kill for them.

In late December, while the rest of the country celebrates Christmas, the Frankel-Streits and their extended family of activists gather to observe the Feast of Holy Innocents. This commemorates the story in the Gospel of Matthew of King Herod, who gets word that a child has been born who eventually will seize his throne. Herod executes all of Bethlehem’s young male children. They also gather Aug. 6 and 9 to commemorate the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Despite his estrangement from the formal Catholic hierarchy, Bill still sees himself as working within the unique inheritance of the early Catholic Church’s resistance to empires.

“The empire always has the death card and that’s why it’s total blasphemy,” he says. “Presidents and pharaohs, they’re the anti-Christ. They’re what has to be resisted. The whole Bible is about resisting the principalities and powers, those who make war on God’s children, the poor.” To that end, Christianity and anarchy become one and the same. “Resistance is love,” he says. “It’s loving the victim so much, and the oppressor, too. It’s like tough love. It’s like living with an alcoholic.”

In his view, the “imperial religion” focuses on the individual instead of the social gospel, which is how we have ended up with a popular religious moment that “focuses more on sexual sin than on injustice.” Frankel-Streit’s belief that all people are part of the body of Christ stands at odds with the personal savior approach prevalent in many churches today, the theological equivalent of union busting.

This is the calling Bill and Sue have been trying to answer since they were released from prison in New York and began their life together. They came back to Dorothy Day House in Washington and had the kids. In 1993 they moved to a Catholic Worker house in Baltimore where Philip Berrigan was living at the time.

“Doing Bible study with Phil always meant you were preparing for a felony,” Bill says.

When they returned to Washington they encountered a spike in violence in the immediate neighborhood. After a kid who used to come by to play was shot execution-style in front of the house, they left.

They moved to Goochland County and lived on rented property for a while. After the 9/11 attacks, the landlord got itchier about having radical tenants and evicted them. Bill and Sue happened to have coffee with a young couple that had recently received a sizable inheritance and offered to give them $100,000. It’s a startling coincidence, but Bill says it’s typical of Catholic Workers to have such providential run-ins.

They used the money to buy the house in Louisa and have been there since. They call it Little Flower, which was the nickname of Therese Lisieux, Dorothy Day’s favorite saint. She advocated the “little way” of the cumulative power in little acts of love. After all, if the massive destruction in Japan during World War II could be caused by something as small as an atom, surely little acts of love could counteract that evil.

Bill’s estrangement from the organized church has been embodied in the person of Bishop Francis Xavier DiLorenzo. He’s the bishop of Richmond, but when Bill was a troublemaking priest in Pennsylvania’s Scranton Diocese, DiLorenzo was part of the church administration.

 

From the Frankel-Streit living room home décor collection.

DiLorenzo’s predecessor was the Bishop-President of Pax Christi USA, the national Catholic peace movement, and sympathetic to the work of the Frankel-Streits. Under DiLorenzo, however, the budget has been cut for social ministry activities. He’s refused to allow speakers from Pax Christi to speak, much less people from the Catholic Worker, and has closed the door on a source of funding for the Frankel-Streits.

That’s become a slightly trickier issue lately. A woman and her three small children had been in need of hospitality and staying at Little Flower before deciding to move to Charlottesville last year. Social Service workers have since intervened, in what the Frankel-Streits say is an unnecessary incursion, and removed the children from their mother’s care. The mother is back living at Little Flower, and Bill and Sue are helping her fight to regain custody so they can all live together. But their lifestyle and nontraditional funding streams are under the microscope now more than ever.

Cooperating with the government agencies to become official foster parents isn’t something the Frankel-Streits have been willing to do before. It’s one small step among several they’re taking toward the mainstream. Last year Bill got arrested, but didn’t serve any jail time for the big three protest holidays. He participated as an expert witness for the first time, rather than as a defendant. There’s even some discussion about the youngest, Gaby, doing a year at a Quaker school in Charlottesville.

Is it possible that in the same season that the general public took glancing notice of Catholics and radical politics, these radical Catholics are taking steps toward the mainstream?

Bill has a slightly different take. He’s not downshifting to more mainstream tactics. Instead, he says, he’s doing what he’s always done: “I ask myself, ‘What does love require at this point?’”


Articles/Archives:
  • Fuzzy Math
  • The Short Way Home
  • Yes, Virginia, There is a "Rock 'n' Roll Hotel"
  • Out of Stock
  • Great Expectations

Comment:
Friday, May 21, 2010 8:29:58 AM by sean
The irony is that if their wonderful anarchy came to light, the anarchists would be the first to die. There would be no government to pay for their day-to-day, and they'd be left to beg on the streets like they do in Carytown, which would only get them shot in post-apocalyptic America.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010 8:50:09 AM by Reason
@Proud Christian Conservative

Why is it that people who don't interpret the Bible exactly the way you see it are "domestic terrorists" who hide behind the Bible and are "no better than a cult?"

It's amusing that you'll stand up and give us a little speech on "exactly what is wrong with America" but then tell everyone who thinks that the country is "broken" to just leave. I guess what you mean is that everone who doesn't agree with your assessment of America's problems can leave.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010 12:59:51 AM by Proud Christian Conservative
I really am disappointed that Style Weekly ran a story like this. I know you are an alternative newspaper and are here to get the word out that main street doesn't hear, but this is just ridiculous. These people are not merely good hearted Catholic anarchists, they are domestic terrorists. They commit crimes and hide behind the Bible as a means of justification. They are no better than a cult who takes a verse out of the Bible and interprets it in a way that justifies their wants. This is exactly what is wrong with America. These people have the right to their opinions, but the second they act on them and commit illegal acts, they forfeit those freedoms. But why am I surprised? We have a President that was mentored by one of the biggest domestic terrorists in history, Mr. Ayers. We have a political party in power that is hell bent on destroyng this country, and will stop at nothing to do it. Let me offer this one thing, "To all of the people that even sympathize with the Frankel-Streits a little bit, for all the people that do not think there is anything wrong with the President of the United States getting lifelong advice from a terrorist and a criminal, for all the people that are ashamed of America or think it is broken, there is the door, you are FREE to get the hell out!" We don't need you and we certainly don't want you.
Sunday, May 09, 2010 8:37:01 PM by Jim Gordon
"G*d D*mned Hippies... they say they want to change the world, but all they do is smoke dope and smell bad."

-Eric Cartman

(how true!)
Saturday, May 08, 2010 10:18:55 AM by Was This a Joke?
Is this the parody issue of Style Weekly?

I mean really- real live domestic terrorists who break on to a military base and destroy government property in one paragraph being labeled "non-violent" a few lines later. Meanwhile an insinuation that tax paying tea partiers participating in truly non-violent politics are the real radicals.

Then throw in a little religious vow breaking, a hovering claim that the spurned church owes them a living, a bit of new religion composting, another vow cast aside as anarchists live on the dole and you have a truly unbelievable mix of absurdities.

Wait- that's not all. In another story Scott Bass is claiming that the road to prosperity is real estate taxes.

More still- a strained attempt to hang an 1862 albatross on the AG- and then a zeitgeist practically obsessed with "Cooch"

Please tell me that Style and company thought it would be funny to satire a detached left wing screed? Did good sense walk out the door with Chris Dovi?
Saturday, May 08, 2010 9:53:33 AM by Panther Dan
Good to see most commenters here with the same sentiments as me....seems only SLIGHTLY hypocritical for them to be bashing the government while happily partaking of the goods and services provided to them free of charge. If these two REALLY want to make a difference, they should....oh, I don't know...find jobs? But that would be too much like work for them. And while I am no longer Catholic (went to Catholic school as a kid, but married in the Episcopal Church), the article, and author, seemed more than happy to try to portray "good Catholics" as the one's more likely than not to be anarchists....disgraceful at best, conspiratorial at worst.
Friday, May 07, 2010 8:41:49 PM by Anonymous
Frank - "What a juvenile thing to say. Instead of challenging the "hurtful" comments - just pull the "hate" card - end of discussion."

Yahonatan - "I found the story interesting and educational. My opinion of how Bill and Sue live is just that my opinion. I see nothing in the story suggesting they are not loving parents, who are raising their children to think critically about social norms. The commenters who "fear" for the children should take a hard look at what their own children are being taught at school, as well as through television and blockbuster movies. Being "different" is not criminal, nor is it neglectful. Maybe I misunderstood all of the writings of Jefferson, Madison, Paine, Locke, Rousseau, et al., but I think they all stood out as being "different" and (Oh, my!) "radical". Why does our populace idolize one group, while vilifying modern Americans who would fall into the same camp? (Didn't the Boston Tea Party involve felonious destruction of private property?)

And to the person who thinks the "hippies" had nothing to do with the U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam why was Nixon so paranoid about the socio-political influence of hippies? So much so that he continued obtaining intelligence on "radical" groups who opposed the war through the FBI's (mostly illegal) operation COINTELPRO. To state that Nixon ended the Vietnam conflict and that Reagan ended the cold war is to ignore the cumulative effects of their predecessors' efforts (or colossal failures), as well as the contributions of the vocal Americans (including "liberal" media) who focused attention on the atrocities of the Vietnam war, etc. I am saddened to see again and again just how ignorant many Americans appear to be regarding the recent history of the United States. I am no longer surprised that the U.S. has essentially repeated the 1960s and 1970s by waging wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, with full "conservative" public support. Collectively, Americans' memory is whatever the political propagandists dictate it shall be."

Yea, sure seems he "pulled the hate card", didnt challenge the hateful comments, and then "ended the discussion".

ad hominem - "An ad hominem, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument toward the person" or "argument against the person"), is an attempt to persuade which links the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.[1] The ad hominem is a classic logical fallacy." The term ad hominem has been used more literally to describe an argument that was based on an individual, or to describe any personal attack.

Do I have to bring up the examples of this?

I guess I could just accuse you of "pulling the hippie card"?

Frank - "What a juvenile thing to say."

Frank - "Epic. Fail."




Friday, May 07, 2010 7:59:55 PM by Philou
This has NOTHING to do with the rational approach of revolutionary anarchism.
Friday, May 07, 2010 6:27:13 PM by Frank
"Morals"

"These freaks hate their country."
-Seems to be a true statement, based on their own words and actions. They are self described "anarchists" and convicted felons. "Freaks" hardly seems "hateful".

"They spit in the faces of every hard working American "
-Again, by having two abled bodied adults not working, but taking from those that do (apparently for decades) seems to be in fact - spitting in the faces of every hard working American.

"That'll really get under their patchouli oiled-scented skins!"
- To have kids that are well-groomed and display proper hygene probably would get under their skin. And do you doubt that their skin smells like patchouli oil?

"Thank God Mr. Hippie "quit" the priesthood."
-Well, considering that he seems to go against actual chuch teachings, this too seems an appropriate statement. Not hateful at all.

"I hope the health bill outlaws patchouli"
-More comical than hateful.

And I'm sure all of those who "totally support their actions" would also support the actions of a right-wing nut job who would break into a welfare office or food bank and start smashing things up, right?

Epic.
Fail.
Friday, May 07, 2010 5:56:53 PM by Morals?
Just because someone disagrees with you politically, it doesn't mean they are "spreading hatred".

Here are a few of the comments made.

"These freaks hate their country."

"They spit in the faces of every hard working American "

"That'll really get under their patchouli oiled-scented skins!"

"Thank God Mr. Hippie "quit" the priesthood."

"I hope the health bill outlaws patchouli"


Yup all totally political disagreements... nothing hatefull.

I can never understand why people have to flat out lie just to support their own criticisms. Any intilliengent person with an objective outlook can see right through your crap. Its just flat out shamefull.

Shame on you.
Friday, May 07, 2010 5:56:48 PM by The Grinning Bandit
What amazing people. What more can I say?

I support their actions and their way of life. If I ever meet the Frankel-Streits on the street, I'll be honored to shake their hands.
Friday, May 07, 2010 3:19:37 PM by Frank
Hey, Yahonatan-

Just because someone disagrees with you politically, it doesn't mean they are "spreading hatred". What a juvenile thing to say. Instead of challenging the "hurtful" comments - just pull the "hate" card - end of discussion.

I’m sorry to have to be the one to break this to you, but the opinions of “vocal conservatives” are just as valid as yours.

I will give the self-serving hippies one thing, though - they are protesting Obama as they did with Bush. Since 2006 - with the Dems in charge of the purse strings - BOTH the wars could have been ended.

Now, with Dems in control of the House, Senate, and the White House, Barry has ESCALATED (Surge, anyone?) the war in Afghanistan and continues to increase our presence in Iraq. He's also continued domestic wiretaps, and bolstered key provisions of the Patriot Act. Unlike most libs, these two at least speak "truth to power" against the current regime.

Change you can believe in, indeed!
Friday, May 07, 2010 11:58:05 AM by Yahonatan
To the insensitive commenters who used truly hurtful words

I didn't realize the readership of Style included so many who delight in spreading hatred. I found the story interesting and educational. My opinion of how Bill and Sue live is just that my opinion. I see nothing in the story suggesting they are not loving parents, who are raising their children to think critically about social norms. The commenters who "fear" for the children should take a hard look at what their own children are being taught at school, as well as through television and blockbuster movies. Being "different" is not criminal, nor is it neglectful. Maybe I misunderstood all of the writings of Jefferson, Madison, Paine, Locke, Rousseau, et al., but I think they all stood out as being "different" and (Oh, my!) "radical". Why does our populace idolize one group, while vilifying modern Americans who would fall into the same camp? (Didn't the Boston Tea Party involve felonious destruction of private property?)

And to the person who thinks the "hippies" had nothing to do with the U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam why was Nixon so paranoid about the socio-political influence of hippies? So much so that he continued obtaining intelligence on "radical" groups who opposed the war through the FBI's (mostly illegal) operation COINTELPRO. To state that Nixon ended the Vietnam conflict and that Reagan ended the cold war is to ignore the cumulative effects of their predecessors' efforts (or colossal failures), as well as the contributions of the vocal Americans (including "liberal" media) who focused attention on the atrocities of the Vietnam war, etc. I am saddened to see again and again just how ignorant many Americans appear to be regarding the recent history of the United States. I am no longer surprised that the U.S. has essentially repeated the 1960s and 1970s by waging wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, with full "conservative" public support. Collectively, Americans' memory is whatever the political propagandists dictate it shall be.

To Amy Biegelsen

Great story! The strong reactions from the vocal conservatives evidence the value of your writing. Keep up the good work!
Friday, May 07, 2010 10:22:34 AM by Frank
"live your values?" Are you kidding?!?

How 'bout "break the law"? If you want effect change - then, you work within the system, lobby your representatives, and make your voice heard.

You DON'T commit crimes such as burglary and vandalism. You DON'T sponge off your neighbors. You DON'T raise generation after generation of people to expect handout after handout.

With almost half of the country paying no taxes at all - we're going to come to a boiling point where (as Mr. Gault tells us) those who actually produce and contribute will no longer support those who take.

One of you who support these leaches, please tell us - why should any able-bodied man or woman, not have to WORK for what they get?
Friday, May 07, 2010 9:55:17 AM by Anonymous
To all the critics: how do you live your values? No matter if you agree with Bill and Sue's beliefs of politics, you have to give them credit for walking the walk. Most of us would agree at this point that our country needs some serious help. Bill and Sue have one way of trying to it better.
Friday, May 07, 2010 8:15:49 AM by Anonymous
Mo, please get the hell out of the state that you hate so much.

Yours is the revolution of the intellectually lazy.
Friday, May 07, 2010 7:56:47 AM by Jon Gault
"The people with money and power will not give it up without a fight."
Actually, we will, and the time is coming soon. And when WE go on strike, you will starve in the dark.
Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:56:22 PM by Everett Walker
I admire these two for standing up for their convictions, but calling yourself an anarchist while living off the public dole is very hypocritical. They would do a lot more service to their cause by actually supporting themselves and their children.
Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:09:18 AM by Mo Karn
I can't get down with religion or god, but what I can get down with is people fighting and sacrificing for social justice. Bill and Sue and Aaron are among a growing population of anarchists in Virginia who are working their butts off to make this a better place. It takes a lot of time, money, effort, and heartbreak to try to impact the world positively. There aren't really many jobs that pay anarchists to be anarchists. But what we do is more important than that.
I think Sue and Bill should take advantage of government programs- why not, otherwise our taxes are only going to fund war and oppression and the prison system.

Virginia is a racist, authoritarian, sexist, homophobic, and classist state. The people with money and power will not give it up without a fight. So anarchists fight and struggle and patch together our lives and communities in efforts to combat the oppression and build a better life for us all.

Smash the State! )
Wednesday, May 05, 2010 6:00:31 PM by A chorus of Kumbaya, anyone?
Wow, these two people are SCARY. Their poor children.

Please give my share of government subsidized benefits to a hard-working, practicing Roman Catholic, Mexican, illegal alien and NOT TO THESE PEOPLE.

I hope the FBI, CIA, Louisa Co. police, SOMEBODY is keeping an eye on them. They are as much or more a danger to our country than foreign terrorists.
Wednesday, May 05, 2010 5:16:02 PM by Aaron S.
These two have been some of the most influential and inspiring people in my life. Though I do not believe in religion, jesus, or any gods, i think their commitment to serving the poor and oppressed people of the world, and fighting constantly for a better world is a wonderful example for all humanity. Thanks to Bill and Sue, and all the other organizers and activists that persevere struggling for justice in a hostile, racist, and authoritarian VA. Hoorah for anarchism and revolution!
Wednesday, May 05, 2010 4:27:59 PM by Lucius Fox
Jim, the word "Catholic" appears TWENTY THREE (23) times in this story. Not particularly relevant (except to bash Catholics) to the story, but I guess it makes good copy for a liberal rag like Style.

I would have liked to focus more on the word "Felon" - as that is what they are, but that word only appears FOUR (4) times.

I suppose that the words "Useless Dirtbags" wouldn't help to promote Style's view of social justice.
Wednesday, May 05, 2010 2:35:52 PM by Rick James
Darn,
Jim Gordon beat me to the punch. Thank God the hippie movement never made a difference in anything.

oh, by the way, it was Nixon, not the hippies that got us out of Viet Nam. It was Reagan not the hippies that got nukes out of Europe.

I hope the health bill outlaws patchouli
Wednesday, May 05, 2010 12:44:04 PM by Clint
Their actions never made much of a difference. Great story!
Wednesday, May 05, 2010 11:21:48 AM by Jason G.
As much as I want to tell Jim (the previous commenter) to shut the hell up, I don't think there are many people who would read this piece without having at least a couple buttons pushed.

Personally, I think Amy Biegelsen's stories featuring composting toilets are always a wild ride and a valuable read. Can anyone, besides Jim Gordon, really say they didn't learn something from Bill and Sue's story after reading this?

For me, the highlight was the little paragraph about Catholicism and the "theological equivalent of union busting." You don't have to agree with everything these folks have done to let their sacrifices stimulate some thought.

Also, it's simply not possible to live in any country without the contradiction of opposing specific government initiatives while giving money to and/or taking services from it - hence, Bill & Sue's anarchistic ideals.
Tuesday, May 04, 2010 8:42:20 PM by Jim Gordon
I have never seen a more hypocritical, self-indulgent, pair of societal parasites as the two hippies in this story.

The fact that we're paying for their lives of "anarchy" (read: selfish, criminal behaviors) only adds to my resentment.

"Down with the GOVERNMENT - MAAAAAAAN!" is their rally cry, while accepting government handouts. Truly pathetic.

Oh, and did you know these two were CATHOLIC?!? Well, if you didn't Amy Biegelsen only mentioned it about a billion times. Thank God Mr. Hippie "quit" the priesthood. I guess he really can't hold a job.

These freaks hate their country.
They drain our resources.
They spit in the faces of every hard working American - of any political stripe.

I can only hope that their children will rebel against them like all teenagers do - only their kids will start to be well groomed and display proper hygiene.

That'll really get under their patchouli oiled-scented skins!

Comment Box
 
Choose an identity
Registered Blogger Other
 
Username 
Password 
No Registered Blogger account? Sign up here.
CAPTCHA Validation
Retype the code from the picture
CAPTCHA Code Image
Speak the code Change the code