LOGIN | REGISTER AS A USER


Article/Archives | Advanced Search

Style Weekly - Cover StoriesStyle Weekly - News & FeaturesStyle Weekly - ArtStyle Weekly - MusicStyle Weekly - MoviesStyle Weekly - Food & DrinkStyle Weekly - CalendarStyle Weekly - OpinionStyle Weekly - Classifieds
TWITTER  |  FACEBOOK  |  RSS  | THE SCOOP HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  ABOUT US  |  ADVERTISE

Bookmark and Share

 
, Posted On: 7/7/2009

The Pageantry of Pleasantry


In his first six months Mayor Dwight Jones eschews the bully pulpit for a kinder, gentler approach. Is it a lack of leadership or a savvy opening salvo?
by Chris Dovi and Scott Bass
On the cover: Mayor Dwight Jones. Photo by Scott Elmquist
 

Not even the rapid-fire, high-pitched potshots of Charles Hughes, a regular City Council gadfly, could disturb the calm over City Council chambers. The silence is deafening. A little more than two dozen people, many of them city officials, sit quietly while the clerk runs through the evening’s abbreviated agenda. It prods no real discussion, no debate. It takes all of about 15 minutes for the council to unanimously approve Mayor Dwight Jones’ biggest decision since taking office six months ago: the hiring of Chief Administrative Officer Byron C. Marshall.

In stark contrast to the confrontational politics of former Mayor L. Douglas Wilder, the Jones administration has instituted a new era of cooperation — of reaching out to council, of reconciliation. Council seems to have accepted the offer. Some people might see a dangerous omen in pleading no contest to approving Jones’ choice of Marshall. He carries considerable baggage from stints in Atlanta and Austin, Texas, and by mere association from seven years working for former Washington Mayor Marion Barry. City Council oozes cordiality.

“If the mayor, you know, um, the mayor has chosen you and my colleagues — I have talked to all of them — we want to give you a chance,” says a rambling Reva Trammell, the only council member to speak before the vote last week, an omen in and of itself. “So again I want to thank you for choosing Richmond and for trying to help us, you know, get our quality of life issues back in the right direction. Thank you.”

Where Wilder governed through media and publicly forced his policies down the throats of City Council members, Jones reaches out to build consensus almost exclusively behind the scenes — whether it’s facilitating one-on-one meetings with his presumptive pick, Marshall, or bringing opponents and proponents of a Shockoe Bottom ballpark development to the table to hash out differences.

Jones’ pick to run the city’s day-to-day operations is also a stark contrast to Wilder’s similarly confrontational No. 2, Harry Black. During a quick, two-question press conference after the council vote last week, Marshall is so soft-spoken that Jones is prone to speak up for him before quickly ushering him into the mayor’s offices.

Has City Hall become too polite? Unlike the always-castigating Wilder, the Jones administration is so bent on keeping the peace that some people worry City Hall is becoming leaderless at a critical juncture. Revenues are dwindling while real estate values plummet, and like the rest of the country Richmond attempts to navigate through the worst economy since the Great Depression. The two most controversial issues facing the city during the last six months — the Shockoe Bottom ballpark plan and the downtown master plan — were settled without Jones’ visible leadership, or anything resembling an official position from the mayor’s office.

If the Wilder adrenaline rush was too much too fast, one high-ranking official at City Hall sees danger in puttering along upstream without vigorous public discourse about where exactly the city is going. Debates have had a tendency to end without much direction from Jones: The Shockoe Bottom ballpark proposal died because Highwoods Properties withdrew it; when controversy bubbled up over the downtown master plan earlier this year, the mayor’s office remained largely silent.

“What is happening is the cooperation is going too far,” the source says of the extended honeymoon that’s descended over City Hall and over Jones’ relationship with City Council. “The city administration and City Council; they’re supposed to be checks and balances, but they’re not acting as checks and balances.”

What’s unsettling, the official says, is that the opposite is true, with some elected officials seemingly more interested in promoting Jones’ agenda than scrutinizing it: “There are certain council members … they’re pretty aggressive about making sure the mayor’s agenda is carried out. Other council members are stepping back and not offering any push back.”

Many people read the mood as simply an aftershock of Wilder. In due time, Councilwoman Ellen Robertson says, there will be plenty of debate between Council and the mayor. Robertson, after all, was the first council member to publicly stand up to Wilder four years ago, and she says she’ll do it again if the occasion calls.

“I am the first to say that we won’t forget what was necessary to be done the last four years,” says Robertson, a close ally of Jones. “If we forget, we are likely to repeat.”

There’s not much that overwhelms when Mayor Dwight C. Jones enters the small, wood-paneled conference room adjacent to his second-floor office. Dressed in a monochromatic, almost safari-themed outfit of tan slacks and matching silk shirt, his understated, friendly demeanor doesn’t crowd the room the way Wilder’s jocular, giant presence could.

 “I think that we have first of all changed the tenor of the conversation in the city,” Jones says, reflecting on his time in office. “That was one of the things that was important to me.”

Both cheerleaders and critics of Jones say that getting along and playing nice has become the single defining achievement of the new administration.

“Dwight is like a cruise ship. … Wilder was like a speedboat,” says Terone Green, a vocal critic of Wilder’s administration who has loose ties to Jones through marriage. “I think [Jones] is being very methodical so we don’t have any mishaps.”

Richmond residents aren’t used to such an approach, Green says: “That’s the problem: Everybody always wants something to happen right away, fast. He’s taking his time.” Wilder’s speedboat may have been fun to watch, Green says, but it “was dangerous, it was fast, it had the potential to flip over.”

Much of Jones’ slow pace can be attributed to the state of the bureaucracy post-Wilder, according to City Hall insiders. They say it’s simply taken this long to clean up the mess. The Wilder autocracy left key positions unfilled for much of the last four years, not to mention the multiple crises that ensued on his watch — most notably the breakdown that came with the attempted eviction of the School Board from City Hall in 2007.

Jones counters critics of his administration’s seemingly slow start with a list of accomplishments or in-the-works projects. Most of them are not sticks-and-bricks like what dominated Wilder’s list of largely never-completed City of the Future proposals. Instead, Jones says his accomplishments are less tangible.

“It takes time to lay that framework,” Jones says. “We have not been slow off the block. You’re not going to get flash.”

First District Councilman Bruce Tyler appreciates the approach, and says that council has not sacrificed its legislative independence in the sunny, get-along atmosphere that’s the daily forecast at City Hall.

“When I look at the difference between the two administrations, this administration has gone out of its way to communicate with me the issues at hand,” Tyler says. He’s scornful of Wilder’s approach in which “I learned about it in the news or from an irate citizen, so I had no way to respond.”

Tyler also dismisses criticism that Marshall’s confirmation came at the expense of a thorough vetting process. He was allowed privately to do all the vetting he needed to, he says. That the laundry wasn’t then aired during Wednesday’s council confirmation should speak well of the process, Tyler says — not ill of it.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, it has been an action-packed six months of Jones, Tyler says. Jones “inherited a disastrous budget mess” from Wilder, he says, recalling the dispute over whether a budget passed by council or Wilder’s own budget was the legal operating budget for the city, and saying that for Jones it meant “three months of cleanup.”

Others counter that flash isn’t the prerequisite. The great promise of the new city charter and an at-large mayor was a gain in leadership and a vision — a mayor who could help set an agenda not only for the city as a whole, but also regionally. To this end, Jones’ reaching out to the boards of supervisors in Henrico and Chesterfield counties earlier this year was a positive step forward, some people say. Indeed, regional cooperation is a central theme for Jones, who says he’s working to rebuild fractured ties with Henrico and Chesterfield. “That’s our theme,” Jones says: “collaboration, cooperation and communication.”

But that’s only the first step. What Richmond and the region need now is a clear vision from the mayor, some say — a mission from the capital city.

“I give him A-plus for reaching out the way he did. He’s very sincere. I don’t think like Wilder there are any hidden agendas,” says a longtime observer of city politics. “He started off beautifully. He now needs to use the reservoir of good will he has to move the city forward. That’s going to require taking a position.”

Some people worry that Jones’ rebuilding process is too narrowly focused and could take the city backwards. Shockoe Slip restaurateur Mike Byrne was a close confidante to Wilder, but he’s also been a longtime business community partner with past city administrations.

For Byrne, the defining moment of the Jones administration came within just a few weeks of the new mayor taking office in January, when Jones announced he would drop two of Wilder’s legal appeals to the state Supreme Court. One was related to the administration’s supremacy over City Council in city employment matters, the other was about the failed eviction of School Board from City Hall, related to the mayor’s authority over city real estate. The resolution of those cases might have helped better define the role of the mayor in this new “strong mayor form of government,” Byrne says.

“But what Dwight said was peace was more important than action,” says Byrne, who worries that the peace came at the expense of certainty. “We still don’t know who’s in charge.”

Byrne is wrong about the lawsuits, Jones says. “At a certain point you just turn the faucet off,” he says. From that spigot flowed hundreds of thousands of dollars and continued ill will that was too expensive, he says. “Some people believe that everything is a [law]suit. … I’m not one of those people.”

As for the questions of the mayor’s role, Jones says, “We [now] have a commission that’s looking at the charter.”

Of the lawsuits, Tyler sees both sides. He acknowledges the wisdom of walking away, but says so much had been invested already — more than $1 million in taxpayer dollars spent on legal fees. “I would have liked to have had the answers,” he says — answers that may have come with just a bit more spent. “But I also didn’t like all the rift that was coming with it.”

A close Jones adviser at the time the suits were dropped told Style that the city’s charter review panel was the proper venue for deciding mayoral authority.

Byrne says that dropping the suits did more than delay a final verdict on authority: It undermines the entire premise of the new government system, which was supposed to provide for clear leadership by a strong mayor and a subordinate City Council. “Dwight basically dismantled it by dropping the suits,” he says. “What we’re left with is really no form of government.”

Jones sees it differently. Without saying it, he seems to imply that the last four years of puffery is so different from his era of normalized governmental relations that it’s become difficult for Richmonders to know what normal is when they get it.

“[We’re] not being impulsive and not running the city through the news,” Jones says. “How can you have a good relationship with City Council when you’re issuing broad dictums every day?”

In the absence of broad dictums, however, comes uncertainty. Jones’ careful treading on hot-button issues, such as the Shockoe ballpark and the master plan, left some people filling in the blanks on their own.

For the business community, which got behind Wilder early and then spent four years trying unsuccessfully to rein him in, Jones’ affiliation with state Sen. Henry Marsh is troublesome. Not only was Marsh said to have been on the payroll of the Highwoods Properties team, He’s also is a mentor of Jones.

And then there’s the recent re-emergence of Saad El-Amin, the former city councilman who spent two and a half years in federal prison for tax fraud, who spoke against a Shockoe Bottom ballpark. El-Amin, still considered a hero in some quarters of the black community, felt compelled to enter the debate because he feared Jones was cozying up to the ballpark developers.

Jones dismisses such criticism. He’s been working to strengthen the city’s economic development efforts, he says, citing a need to change the tone of the conversation so that the city’s development agency isn’t a flaccid entity with no real budget or power. “I can’t remember when the city last had a serious economic development department,” Jones says, a hint of long-held distain creeping into his voice.

Marshall may well be another part of Jones’s cooperation, collaboration, communication theme. In Atlanta, where he was chief operating officer, Marshall established a reputation as a bridge builder.

“Even though he reported to the mayor, he was always very responsive to the city council,” says Hazel Jacobs, retired director of research for Atlanta City Council who also happens to be Richmond Councilman Marty Jewell’s cousin. “That’s sort of unique among city administrators. They don’t really have to respond to the city council, but Byron always did.”

With his administrative team now in place, Jones says City Hall’s approach when it comes to projects such as the Bottom ballpark won’t simply be reactionary. “We want to get to the place where the developers are responding to our vision and we’re not just responding to the developers’ desires or plans,” he says.

As for Marsh, those who know both Jones and the senior senator say it’s too early to read between the lines. Former state Sen. Benjamin Lambert, who lost his seat in 2007 to another Marsh protégé, Donald McEachin, says Jones is “too bright” to be led around by Marsh or anyone else, for that matter.

“I don’t think Dwight would be a very strong person if [Marsh] was guiding him,” Lambert says, adding that Jones’ critics need to give him a little more time. “I think he’s trying to cooperate with council, and the School Board and different organizations. He’s not trying to run over anybody. He’s listening.”

With the hiring of Marshall, Jones says the real work is only just beginning. But don’t expect any broad dictums to define his term as mayor. Improving the city will have to take place without big politics and buildings, and instead with a block-by-block, neighborhood-by-neighborhood approach.

“We’re not out there ringing the bell and beating the drum to make people like us,” he says, calling into question what was accomplished by all the pomp and circumstance under Wilder. After four years under the Jones administration, he says, “We want to have some evidence that we’ve been here.” S


Articles/Archives:
  • Fuzzy Math
  • The Short Way Home
  • Yes, Virginia, There is a "Rock 'n' Roll Hotel"
  • Out of Stock
  • Great Expectations

Comment:
Monday, July 13, 2009 5:44:25 PM by Constant Reader
Tina,

One of the problems in this city is that people think keeping secrets will get things fixed. The secret-keeping societies and fraternities haven't done such a great job so far. What makes you think that more secret-keeping will help anything or anyone? Remember: You are only as sick as the secrets you keep.
Monday, July 13, 2009 4:46:16 PM by Tina
It's ironic that the "City Employee" posting talks about things coming to light. Much of the problem of a bad city reputation comes from the stagnant unprofessional workers that make up city hall. As a long-time city resident, there is no other place of business I can think of that lacks customer service, efficiency and competence as much as the city. Ask any city resident that has to deal with discourteous and slack front-line service employees on a regular basis. It is horrible for no reason. So when we hear from "the low man on the totem pole", it's pretty apparent that it's just another disgruntled employee not happy with their lot in professional life. You should ask yourself, are you truly doing what you can in your position to make things better or are you a contributing to the problem by shedding light on petty office gossip. If you aren’t trying to be a part of the solutions, I would suggest you stay in your lane, keep your head down and do your 9-5. If it is so bad and if the problems are bigger than you, find another job. I guarantee you will be hard pressed to find one where you agree with the way that everything is handled.
Sunday, July 12, 2009 7:34:52 PM by Sally
He has a good church that has done much for the Blackwell community...your false inuendo is stupidity. you have no credible information to suggest otherwise. Uninformed people really shouldn't comment. Come to the church and see a church that has changed a community for over 35 years. If not, stay home and keep throwing stones. really doesn't mater, dood will still occupy the second floor of city hall. Peace..
Sunday, July 12, 2009 10:54:03 AM by Anonymous
Hah! The Appalachian Trail leads right to Dwight's church.
Saturday, July 11, 2009 9:16:39 PM by Constant Reader
Gerald,

Then why are you wasting your time responding if the concern about Jones being a major "flirt" is not worthy of a response? Prolly just depends on your definition of the word "is" and where the Appalachian Trail intersects with the Imani Temple, eh?
Saturday, July 11, 2009 1:55:21 PM by Gerald
flirtng with women is crap, sour grapes from someone who didn't vote for him anyway, not worthy of a response. Duplicity...he doesn't have to be on any private entities side, just do whats best for the city. ONly been in 6 months, got a good team in place, he is doing fine...will continue to do fine. if you have a problem with him make an appointment at CH, tell him to his face, if not keep moaning on this crappy site
Saturday, July 11, 2009 1:51:22 PM by Gerald
Not a plain jane, fight for what, a ballk park plan that was crap to begin with. i get it, there some folks that don't like jones...cool, but there a a lot of folk who do. all of this stupidity about him hitting on women is sour grapes. As for duplicity, he doesn't have to be on any private entities side, just the city"s side. he's doing fine...will continue to do fine. if you have a probem make and appointment go to down to CH and tell him, if not keep on complaining on this site...it really doesn't matter.
Friday, July 10, 2009 11:54:11 AM by Don
http://saverichmond.com/?p1549
Friday, July 10, 2009 9:59:36 AM by City employee
Jones meets behind the scenes with leaders of all of these initiatives and promises each that he is on their side. He's really stupid if he doesn't think these people talk - they do - and Richmond is a small town. All of this duplicity behind closed doors will catch up with him soon enough. Jones needs to remember that the public has a right to know what's going on in City Hall - those with whom he is confiding, as they spread the word of what he is saying out of the public eye, will cause great embarrasment to Jones and in turn the city and City Council members. Council members, particularly those quoted in the story - you're going to be left with egg on your face when this all comes to light. Serve as a check and make sure that government business, the business of the people, is fully disclosed. I'll say it again - Richmond is a small town and the truth will come out. Indeed, it always does. I'll a little man on the totem pole - if I know all of the things going on, you can bet others do too.
Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:08:19 AM by cr
I just think if he concentrated half his time on the important things (schools,etc.) that he put into the ballpark, maybe that would be better.
Rather than trying to waste money on things that are out of the relm or possibility, I mean sure it would be nice if we could buy a shiny new car, but in reality I need to pay my rent. Ballpark should not come until some money is poured into the things that need it.
Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:32:51 AM by Not a Plain Jane
Michael,
Comes a time when a leader has to stand up and fight for what they believe in. Most likely sooner, rather than later, Jones is going to have to stand and deliver something of substance. So far, all I hear that he has been doing is flirting with the pretty ladies in City Hall, and frankly, I am plenty sick of leaders who are good at standing around chit-chatting and winking when there is plenty of work that needs to be done. I hope that the situation is that he considers flirting a sign of good manners and he will get busy doing something for the City other than being a pleasant bon vivant. Heaven help us all if he doesn't.
Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:25:44 AM by Michael
change takes time, but impulsive idiots don't understand that. for all wilder's bully tactics, what did he have to show for it. the abscense of conflict is not stagnancy. consensus building is not a bad thing. oh yeah, he's supposed to fix richmond schools, streets, housing and crime in 6 months right. you dummies probablly voted for Pantele or grey...oops i forgot both of em got slaugtered by jones. no matter what style says (always hated jones) they can't get a majority of 5 districts to vote him out, so DJ could care less about Style or his critics
Wednesday, July 08, 2009 1:28:30 PM by Dale
Hahahahah ... Jones has a vision and I'm Donald Duck (FYI I'm not). Let's not forget, he moved into city hall right after the election with his "transition team" - here it is July and he is exactly where he will be a year from now. This man has no vision beyond not rocking the boat or moving forward. Richmond is right back to where it always wants to be - nowhere.
Wednesday, July 08, 2009 1:19:12 PM by Reggie
wilder f''d up things so bad, this guy has a hell of a clean up job. you don't have to be a jerk (see wilder) to get things done. the ballpark plan was crap to begin with. Jones had to change the culture at city hall, now he has his team in place. The guy has a vision, it takes more than 6 months to realize a vision particulary in a reccssion...idiots!
Wednesday, July 08, 2009 9:58:26 AM by cr
bullsh.t, how can anyone even pretend this guy is better, he got his ballpark turned down and now he wants a high speed rail to waste money on, why dont u mention how bad richmonds schools, streets, housing, crime is. and what he is doing for that.

Comment Box
 
Choose an identity
Registered Blogger Other
 
Username 
Password 
No Registered Blogger account? Sign up here.
CAPTCHA Validation
Retype the code from the picture
CAPTCHA Code Image
Speak the code Change the code