LOGIN | REGISTER AS A USER


Article/Archives | Advanced Search

Style Weekly - Cover StoriesStyle Weekly - News & FeaturesStyle Weekly - ArtStyle Weekly - MusicStyle Weekly - MoviesStyle Weekly - Food & DrinkStyle Weekly - CalendarStyle Weekly - OpinionStyle Weekly - Classifieds
TWITTER  |  FACEBOOK  |  RSS HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  ABOUT US  |  ADVERTISE

Bookmark and Share

 
, Posted On: 9/1/2009

Inspectors Target First Fridays?


Organizers and gallery owners sweat possible code crackdown at upcoming artswalk.
by Chris Dovi
Christina Newton, who organizes the First Fridays Artswalk, says an assistant fire marshal showed up at last month’s event and now has gallery operators worried about a pending code-enforcement crackdown.  File photo by Scott Elmquist
 

Organizers and participants in the city’s First Fridays Artwalk are walking on pins and needles in the countdown to the next event, Sept. 4, fearing a return of city inspectors who made an appearance at last month’s event.

Though city officials insist they have no plans to interfere, concern among participating galleries and shops along Broad Street stems from increased attention and recent visits from city fire- and building-code inspectors.

Many of the businesses, operating in decades-old buildings, fail to meet fire codes to allow the large crowds generated during the arts walk, and many would face challenging expense hurdles if city officials forced them to upgrade facilities to meet modern requirements.

Additionally, few if any possess certificates of occupancy to allow crowds of more than a dozen inside at any given time. The arts walk has been held for eight years along a stretch of Broad Street once crime-ridden and plagued by blighted, empty storefronts.

“Everybody’s really worried,” says Christina Newton, director of Curated Culture, which coordinates the monthly walk. “What we’re worried about is not knowing what’s happening — if anything.”
What Newton does know is that the city’s assistant fire marshal attended August’s First Friday event, giving helpful tips to business owners, but also setting their nerves on edge. She also knows that in follow-up e-mails with that official, William Andrews, her own nerves hardly were put at ease.

“First Friday concentrated increased activities to those downtown blocks, thus focusing attention versus our otherwise sporadic discoveries scattered throughout [the] city,” Andrews writes in one mid-August e-mail response to Newton’s concerns.

Andrews, who’s also a member of the city’s Community Assisted Public Safety team, or CAPS, indicates that his visit was based on weeks of research into the businesses and their occupancy limits, and indicates that he’s passed his research and findings along to the city’s community development department.

“I completely understand the city’s need to enforce public safety, and city code,” Newton says. “No one is against enforcing [the law]. On the other hand, these businesses and this effort, it’s helping to change the face of Richmond, drive economic development to downtown.

“Without the opportunity to have substantial traffic in these small businesses during First Friday, many of these businesses will go away,” she says. “That’s a fact.”

Community Development Director Rachel Flynn says she’s unaware of any plans by members of her staff to attend First Fridays in an official capacity, or of any ongoing investigations into complaints of noncompliance with city code.

The monthly event’s importance as a cornerstone of Broad Street’s cultural and economic minirenaissance isn’t lost on the mayor’s office, which says the city has no plans to crack down on First Fridays or any of its participants, though Tammy Hawley, Mayor Dwight Jones’ spokeswoman, acknowledges the need to balance business with public safety.

“The mayor is in full support of this … event and we don’t want to see a situation develop that is in any way a hardship to the businesses involved in this event,” she says, noting that the only city official she knows of who plans to attend this First Friday is Jones himself. “It is contributing to the economic success of the city and we want to see this event continue.”


Articles/Archives:
  • Velvet Loses Liquor License
  • Twitter Bound
  • Brittney’s Ascent
  • Industrial Fumes
  • Geico Gecko Tags Richmond

Comment:
Wednesday, September 02, 2009 8:08:04 PM by BE
I love how the arts / progressive / liberal / folks love to hold corporations feet to the fire regarding regulations, safety, etc in the name of "consumer rights" and "social activism", yet when the same regulations are put upon them we see them shiver and shake...
Wednesday, September 02, 2009 2:10:18 PM by Scott Burger
"Do you mean a real estate market crash or actual falling buildings? "

Does it matter which? I think both are possible.

"why are you associating CC/FF with CenterStage when you point out that CC/FF isn't funded by the city?"

Because while they are vastly different animals, they both have the premise that art is what Richmond needs right now. While I like CC, I don't think art can solve the City's worsening issues, especially in the case of Center Stage, where it is distracting more of the City's dwindling resources.

In other words, we need more reconstruction and less renaissance.
Wednesday, September 02, 2009 12:33:46 PM by Anonymous
Hey, Scott, what do you mean by "the commercial real estate crashes"? Do you mean a real estate market crash or actual falling buildings? You know as well as I do that the commercial real estate market is bad anyway and the infrastructure problems looming large like a white elephants. Also, why are you associating CC/FF with CenterStage when you point out that CC/FF isn't funded by the city?
Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:52:56 PM by Anonymous
Problem solved until someone gets hurt in a fire or cut on that glass. In the land of the law suit everything is good until someone feels they have been slighted or could get their hands on some unearned cash. If you don't think it will happen look at what is happening in the bottom...a flood plain..everyone wants to get something for nothing. Business owners don't want to make the required improvements because they cut into the profits. To protect themselves from the inevitable law suit, they ought to.
Tuesday, September 01, 2009 6:14:40 PM by Jeff E.
Laws are made, repealed, over-enforced, and ignored all the time to adapt to reality. Honestly Anonymous, what is it about FF and Broad Street that gets you so fired up? Since most of these buildings have glass fronts I say mount a hammer beside them. Problem solved.
Tuesday, September 01, 2009 5:47:27 PM by Anonymous
I didn't even know the Mayor was legally allowed to let the law to be ignored...silly me! In that case, I want to sell marijuana and cocaine from a street vendor's table on the sidewalk during this event. I'm sure Mayor Jones won't "want to see a situation develop that is in any way a hardship to" my business since I am "contributing to the economic success of the city."
Tuesday, September 01, 2009 5:25:10 PM by Scott Burger
I don't think anyone is out to get the ArtWalk, least of all me. However I will also say that Richmonders are going to have to make more painful decisions in the future- continue to fund the arts (especially Center Stage!!!!!!) or supply basic citizen services. I know which one I will choose.
And yes, I know Curated Culture and I have a lot of respect for Christina Newton and the fact that they are largely NOT funded by the City. They work on a shoestring which is admirable. But what happens when the commercial real estate crashes? In other words, we will have a lot more pressing safety concerns in the future no matter what. Art is great but I don't think its going to save Richmond (.com), no matter what public money or attention is paid to it.

Comment Box
 
Choose an identity
Registered Blogger Other
 
Username 
Password 
No Registered Blogger account? Sign up here.
CAPTCHA Validation
Retype the code from the picture
CAPTCHA Code Image
Speak the code Change the code